• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后节段性和整体腰椎前凸的预测因素:连续病例系列研究

Predictors of Postoperative Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Consecutive Case Series.

作者信息

Zhang Justin K, Greenberg Jacob K, Javeed Saad, Benedict Braeden, Botterbush Kathleen S, Dibble Christopher F, Khalifeh Jawad M, Brehm Samuel, Jain Deeptee, Dorward Ian, Santiago Paul, Molina Camilo, Pennicooke Brenton H, Ray Wilson Z

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):425-437. doi: 10.1177/21925682231193610. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1177/21925682231193610
PMID:37522797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11877597/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Case-Series.

OBJECTIVES

Due to heterogeneity in previous studies, the effect of MI-TLIF on postoperative segmental lordosis (SL) and lumbar lordosis (LL) remains unclear. Therefore, we aim to identify radiographic factors associated with lordosis after surgery in a homogenous series of MI-TLIF patients.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review identified consecutive patients who underwent single-level MI-TLIF for grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis from 2015-2020. All surgeries underwent unilateral facetectomies and a contralateral facet release with expandable interbody cages. PROs included the ODI and NRS-BP for low-back pain. Radiographic measures included SL, disc height, percent spondylolisthesis, cage positioning, LL, PI-LL mismatch, sacral-slope, and pelvic-tilt. Surgeries were considered "lordosing" if the change in postoperative SL was ≥ +4° and "kyphosing" if ≤ -4°. Predictors of change in SL/LL were evaluated using Pearson's correlation and multivariable regression.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients with an average follow-up of 22.5 (range 12-61) months were included. Patients experienced significant improvements in ODI (29% ± 22% improvement, < .001) and NRS-BP (3.3 ± 3 point improvement, < .001). There was a significant increase in mean SL (Δ3.43° ± 4.37°, < .001) while LL (Δ0.17° ± 6.98°, > .05) remained stable. Thirty-eight (52%) patients experienced lordosing MI-TLIFs, compared to 4 (5%) kyphosing and 31 (43%) neutral MI-TLIFs. A lower preoperative SL and more anterior cage placement were associated with the greatest improvement in SL (β = -.45° = .001, β = 15.06° < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, the majority of patients experienced lordosing or neutral MI-TLIFs (n = 69, 95%). Preoperative radiographic alignment and anterior cage placement were significantly associated with target SL following MI-TLIF.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性病例系列研究。

目的

由于既往研究存在异质性,微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)对术后节段性前凸(SL)和腰椎前凸(LL)的影响仍不明确。因此,我们旨在确定一组同质的MI-TLIF患者术后与前凸相关的影像学因素。

方法

一项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2015年至2020年因1度退行性腰椎滑脱接受单节段MI-TLIF手术的连续患者。所有手术均行单侧小关节突切除术及对侧小关节松解并植入可扩张椎间融合器。患者报告结局(PROs)包括腰椎功能障碍指数(ODI)和下腰痛数字等级量表(NRS-BP)。影像学测量指标包括SL、椎间盘高度、腰椎滑脱百分比、椎间融合器位置、LL、骨盆入射角与腰椎前凸不匹配度、骶骨倾斜度和骨盆倾斜度。若术后SL变化≥ +4°,手术视为“前凸增加”;若≤ -4°,则视为“后凸增加”。使用Pearson相关性分析和多变量回归评估SL/LL变化的预测因素。

结果

共纳入73例患者,平均随访22.5个月(范围12 - 61个月)。患者的ODI显著改善(改善29% ± 22%,P <.001),NRS-BP也显著改善(改善3.3 ± 3分,P <.001)。平均SL显著增加(Δ3.43° ± 4.37°,P <.001),而LL保持稳定(Δ0.17° ± 6.98°,P >.05)。38例(52%)患者经历了前凸增加的MI-TLIF手术,4例(5%)为后凸增加,31例(43%)为无明显前凸或后凸变化的手术。术前较低的SL和椎间融合器更靠前的放置位置与SL的最大改善相关(β = -.45°,P =.001;β = 15.06°,P <.001)。

结论

在我们的研究系列中,大多数患者经历了前凸增加或无明显前凸或后凸变化的MI-TLIF手术(n = 69,95%)。术前影像学对线和椎间融合器的前位放置与MI-TLIF术后的目标SL显著相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c5b/11877597/ad10a9d16a9e/10.1177_21925682231193610-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c5b/11877597/c48d31690b65/10.1177_21925682231193610-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c5b/11877597/1d5a7fc554f2/10.1177_21925682231193610-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c5b/11877597/bf0232360bc0/10.1177_21925682231193610-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c5b/11877597/ad10a9d16a9e/10.1177_21925682231193610-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c5b/11877597/c48d31690b65/10.1177_21925682231193610-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c5b/11877597/1d5a7fc554f2/10.1177_21925682231193610-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c5b/11877597/bf0232360bc0/10.1177_21925682231193610-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c5b/11877597/ad10a9d16a9e/10.1177_21925682231193610-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of Postoperative Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Consecutive Case Series.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后节段性和整体腰椎前凸的预测因素:连续病例系列研究
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):425-437. doi: 10.1177/21925682231193610. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Comparison of local and regional radiographic outcomes in minimally invasive and open TLIF: a propensity score-matched cohort.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术局部和区域影像学结果的比较:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Mar 11;37(3):384-394. doi: 10.3171/2022.1.SPINE211254. Print 2022 Sep 1.
3
Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.评估可活动扩张式椎间融合器在微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症中的影像学和临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Jan;44(1):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.FOCUS17562.
4
Segmental and overall lumbar lordosis after single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后节段性及整体腰椎前凸:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2025 May 2;43(1):70-82. doi: 10.3171/2025.1.SPINE231363. Print 2025 Jul 1.
5
Does transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion induce lordosis or kyphosis? Radiographic evaluation with a minimum 2-year follow-up.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术是否会导致腰椎前凸或后凸?至少 2 年随访的影像学评估。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Jul 9;35(4):419-426. doi: 10.3171/2020.12.SPINE201665. Print 2021 Oct 1.
6
Preoperative Radiographic Prediction Tool for Early Postoperative Segmental and Lumbar Lordosis Alignment After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术后早期节段性和腰椎前凸对线的术前影像学预测工具
Cureus. 2021 Sep 21;13(9):e18175. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18175. eCollection 2021 Sep.
7
Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后腰椎前凸的恢复:系统评价。
Spine J. 2019 May;19(5):951-958. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
8
Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.术式是否有影响?单节段腰椎融合术中脊柱骨盆参数的比较影像学分析。
Spine J. 2018 Nov;18(11):1999-2008. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
9
Impact of preoperative age-adjusted sagittal imbalance on radiographic and clinical outcomes following 1-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis.术前年龄调整矢状失平衡对退行性腰椎滑脱症单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后影像学和临床结果的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Aug 2;41(4):489-497. doi: 10.3171/2024.4.SPINE23737. Print 2024 Oct 1.
10
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of local and regional radiographic outcomes in minimally invasive and open TLIF: a propensity score-matched cohort.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术局部和区域影像学结果的比较:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Mar 11;37(3):384-394. doi: 10.3171/2022.1.SPINE211254. Print 2022 Sep 1.
2
Radiographic and clinical outcomes in one- and two-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: a comparison of bullet versus banana cages.单节段和双节段经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的影像学和临床结果:子弹型椎间融合器与香蕉型椎间融合器的比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Dec 17;36(6):918-927. doi: 10.3171/2021.8.SPINE21687. Print 2022 Jun 1.
3
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - A narrative review on the present status.
微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术——现状的叙述性综述
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Sep 8;22:101592. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101592. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术采用可扩张 cage:术后晚期沉降风险增加,但围手术期结局无明显改善:一项临床单中心研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;156:e57-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.127. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
5
Does transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion induce lordosis or kyphosis? Radiographic evaluation with a minimum 2-year follow-up.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术是否会导致腰椎前凸或后凸?至少 2 年随访的影像学评估。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Jul 9;35(4):419-426. doi: 10.3171/2020.12.SPINE201665. Print 2021 Oct 1.
6
Expandable Versus Static Cages in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.可扩张与静态 cage 在微创腰椎椎体间融合术中的应用:系统评价与荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jul;151:e607-e614. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.090. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
7
The PROCESS 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Preferred Reporting Of CasESeries in Surgery (PROCESS) Guidelines.《2020年手术病例系列报告共识优先报告指南(PROCESS)更新指南》
Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
8
Clinical and Radiographic Comparison Between Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Bilateral Facetectomies.开放与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术双侧椎板切除的临床与影像学比较
Global Spine J. 2021 Jul;11(6):903-910. doi: 10.1177/2192568220932879. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
9
Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence in Patients Received Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后患者发生 cage 沉降的危险因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Oct 1;45(19):E1279-E1285. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003557.
10
Transfacet Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Interbody Device-Part II: Consecutive Case Series.使用可扩张椎间融合器的经小关节微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术——第二部分:连续病例系列
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 Oct 15;19(5):518-529. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa144.