• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助治疗胃食管结合部 II 型肿瘤的手术方式的影响:一项多中心、大样本量回顾性队列分析。

Impact of the Surgical Approach for Neoadjuvantly Treated Gastroesophageal Junction Type II Tumors: A Multinational, High-volume Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral, Cancer, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):683-691. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006011. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006011
PMID:37522845
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore oncologic outcomes of transhiatal gastrectomy (THG) or transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) for neoadjuvantly treated gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) Siewert type II adenocarcinomas, a multinational, high-volume center cohort analysis was undertaken.

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy (CTx) followed by surgery is the standard therapy for locally advanced GEJ. However, the optimal surgical approach for type II GEJ tumors remains unclear, as the decision is mainly based on individual experience and assessment of operative risk.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 5 prospectively maintained databases was conducted. Between 2012 and 2021, 800 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria for type II GEJ tumors and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy or CTx. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (mOS). Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing THG (n=163, 20.4%) had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification and cT stage ( P <0.001) than patients undergoing TTE (n=637, 79.6%). Neoadjuvant therapy was different as the THG group were mainly undergoing CTx (87.1%, P <0.001). The TTE group showed higher tumor regression ( P =0.009), lower ypT/ypM categories (both P <0.001), higher nodal yield ( P =0.009) and higher R0 resection rate ( P =0.001). The mOS after TTE was longer (78.0 vs 40.0 months, P =0.013). After propensity score matching a higher R0 resection rate ( P =0.004) and mOS benefit after TTE remained ( P =0.04). Subgroup analyses of patients without distant metastasis ( P =0.037) and patients only after neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( P =0.021) confirmed the survival benefit of TTE. TTE was an independent predictor of longer survival.

CONCLUSION

Awaiting results of the randomized CARDIA trial, TTE should in high-volume centers be considered the preferred approach due to favorable oncologic outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨新辅助治疗食管胃交界部(GEJ)Siewert Ⅱ型腺癌患者行经胸食管切除术(TTE)或经食管裂孔胃切除术(THG)的肿瘤学结果。本研究为一项多中心、大样本量的队列分析。

背景

新辅助放化疗或围手术期化疗(CTx)后手术是局部晚期 GEJ 的标准治疗方法。然而,对于 II 型 GEJ 肿瘤的最佳手术方法仍不清楚,因为该决定主要基于个人经验和手术风险评估。

方法

对 5 个前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析。2012 年至 2021 年期间,800 例符合 II 型 GEJ 肿瘤和新辅助放化疗或 CTx 标准的患者纳入本研究。主要终点是中位总生存期(mOS)。采用倾向性评分匹配来最小化选择偏倚。

结果

行 THG(n=163,20.4%)的患者 ASA 分级和 cT 分期高于行 TTE(n=637,79.6%)(P<0.001)。新辅助治疗也有所不同,因为 THG 组主要接受 CTx(87.1%,P<0.001)。TTE 组的肿瘤退缩程度更高(P=0.009),ypT/ypM 分期更低(均 P<0.001),淋巴结检出数更多(P=0.009),R0 切除率更高(P=0.001)。TTE 后的 mOS 更长(78.0 个月 vs 40.0 个月,P=0.013)。经过倾向性评分匹配后,TTE 组的 R0 切除率更高(P=0.004),且 mOS 获益仍有统计学意义(P=0.04)。在无远处转移的患者亚组(P=0.037)和仅接受新辅助化疗的患者亚组(P=0.021)中,TTE 也证实了生存获益。TTE 是生存时间延长的独立预测因素。

结论

在 CARDIA 试验的结果公布之前,由于 TTE 具有良好的肿瘤学结果,在高容量中心,TTE 应被视为首选方法。

相似文献

1
Impact of the Surgical Approach for Neoadjuvantly Treated Gastroesophageal Junction Type II Tumors: A Multinational, High-volume Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis.新辅助治疗胃食管结合部 II 型肿瘤的手术方式的影响:一项多中心、大样本量回顾性队列分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):683-691. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006011. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
The CARDIA-trial protocol: a multinational, prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing transthoracic esophagectomy with transhiatal extended gastrectomy in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) type II.CARDIA 试验方案:一项比较经胸食管切除术与经胸食管裂孔扩大胃切除术治疗 II 型胃食管结合部腺癌的多中心、前瞻性、随机、临床试验。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 20;20(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07152-1.
3
Transthoracic esophagectomy compared to transhiatal extended gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.经胸食管切除术与经食管裂孔扩大胃切除术治疗食管胃交界腺癌的比较:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Aug 13;35(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doab090.
4
Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.全球食管和胃食管交界癌治疗中手术技术的趋势
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12480.
5
[Survival comparison of Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction between transthoracic and transabdominal approaches:a joint data analysis of thoracic and gastrointestinal surgery].[经胸与经腹入路治疗食管胃交界部Siewert II型腺癌的生存比较:胸外科与胃肠外科联合数据分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 25;22(2):132-142.
6
Contemporary outcomes for resected type 1-3 gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience.切除治疗 1-3 型胃食管结合部腺癌的当代结果:单中心经验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 May;28(5):634-639. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.040. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
7
Comparison of transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches in the treatment of Siewert type II esophagogastric junction cancers: A propensity score-matching analysis.经腹与经胸入路治疗 Siewert Ⅱ型食管胃结合部腺癌的对比:倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb;48(2):370-376. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
8
Surgical strategies in true adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG II): thoracoabdominal or abdominal approach?胃食管结合部(AEG II)真正腺癌的手术策略:胸腹联合入路还是腹部入路?
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Mar;21(2):303-314. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0746-1. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
9
Esophagectomy or Total Gastrectomy for Siewert 2 Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma? A Registry-Based Analysis.食管切除术或全胃切除术治疗 Siewert 2 型胃食管结合部(GEJ)腺癌?一项基于注册的分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8485-8494. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10346-x. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
10
Postoperative complications after a transthoracic esophagectomy or a transhiatal gastrectomy in patients with esophagogastric junctional cancers: a prospective nationwide multicenter study.胸腹腔镜联合与经胸经裂孔食管胃切除术治疗食管胃结合部腺癌术后并发症的前瞻性全国多中心研究
Gastric Cancer. 2022 Mar;25(2):430-437. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01255-9. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
[Evidence for the extent and oncological benefit of lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer].[食管癌淋巴结清扫范围及肿瘤学获益的证据]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Apr;96(4):273-280. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02215-6. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
Response to Letter to the Editor on "Impact of the Surgical Approach for Neoadjuvantly Treated Gastroesophageal Junction Type II Tumors: A Multinational, High-Volume Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis".对《致编辑的信》的回复,主题为“新辅助治疗的胃食管交界部II型肿瘤手术方式的影响:一项多国、高容量中心回顾性队列分析”
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Aug 12;5(3):e479. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000479. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Comment on "Impact of the Surgical Approach for Neoadjuvantly Treated Gastroesophageal Junction Type II Tumors: A Multinational, High-Volume Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis".
关于“新辅助治疗的胃食管交界部II型肿瘤手术方式的影响:一项多中心、高容量中心回顾性队列分析”的评论
Ann Surg Open. 2024 May 22;5(2):e446. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000446. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
[Tailored surgery in the treatment of gastroesophageal cancer].[个体化手术治疗胃食管癌]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Apr;95(4):261-267. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02056-3. Epub 2024 Feb 27.