Suppr超能文献

食管上、下囊之间的距离预测孤立性食管闭锁患儿延迟修复可能性的作用。

The role of distance between upper and lower esophageal pouches to predict the possibility of delayed repair in children with isolated esophageal atresia.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Pediatric Radiology Division, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Jul 31;39(1):245. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05528-5.

Abstract

AIM

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the role of distance between upper and lower esophageal pouches and pouch lengths to predict delayed primary repair (DPR) in patients with isolated esophageal atresia (EA).

METHODS

Patients with isolated EA were evaluated for demographic features, associated anomalies, surgical options, and complications. The babygrams obtained for evaluating gap assessment were examined for the distance between pouches and pouch lengths. Patients were divided into two groups: DPR and esophageal replacement (ER).

RESULTS

Fourteen cases with a mean age of 4.1 ± 1.9 years (1-9 years) were included. Female to male ratio was 6:8. There was no significant difference between DPR and ER groups for pouch lengths. The median distance between two pouches were significantly higher in ER group [50 mm (29.4-83.6) vs 18.8 mm (3.4-34.5) (p < 0.05)]. The distance between two pouches and pouch lengths were similar in patients with and without anastomotic strictures (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both upper and lower pouch lengths were shorter in ER group compared to DPR group. However, pouch lengths cannot be considered as a single criterion to predict the need for ER. Large cohort of patients are needed to define the cut-off values for shortest pouch length to achieve a DPR.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在评估食管上、下囊之间的距离和囊长度在预测单纯性食管闭锁(EA)患者延迟性初次修复(DPR)中的作用。

方法

评估单纯性 EA 患者的人口统计学特征、相关畸形、手术选择和并发症。用于评估间隙评估的婴儿片检查了囊之间的距离和囊长度。患者分为两组:DPR 和食管替代(ER)。

结果

纳入了 14 例平均年龄为 4.1±1.9 岁(1-9 岁)的患者。男女比例为 6:8。在 ER 组和 DPR 组之间,囊长度没有显著差异。ER 组两个囊之间的中位数距离明显更高[50mm(29.4-83.6)与 18.8mm(3.4-34.5)(p<0.05)]。在有和无吻合口狭窄的患者中,两个囊之间的距离和囊长度相似(p>0.05)。

结论

与 DPR 组相比,ER 组的上、下囊长度都更短。然而,囊长度不能作为预测需要 ER 的单一标准。需要更大的患者队列来定义最短囊长度的截断值以实现 DPR。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验