Suppr超能文献

根据 ASME V&V40 对计算模型进行可信度评估:在博洛尼亚生物力学计算机断层扫描解决方案中的应用。

Credibility assessment of computational models according to ASME V&V40: Application to the Bologna Biomechanical Computed Tomography solution.

机构信息

PolitoBIOMedLab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Italy; Medical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

Medical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy; Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Itlay.

出版信息

Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Oct;240:107727. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107727. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

When a computational model aims to be adopted beyond research purposes, e.g. to inform a clinical or regulatory decision, trust must be placed in its predictive accuracy. This practically translates into the need to demonstrate its credibility. In fact, prior to its adoption for regulatory purposes, an in silico methodology should be proven credible enough for the scope. This has become especially relevant as, although evidence of the safety and efficacy of new medical products or interventions has been traditionally provided to the regulator experimentally, i.e., in vivo or ex vivo, recently the idea to inform a regulatory decision in silico has made its way in the regulatory scenario. While a harmonised technical standard is currently missing in the EU regulatory system, in 2018 the ASME issued V&V40-2018, where a risk-based framework to assess the credibility of a computational model through the performance of predefined credibility activities is provided. The credibility framework is here applied to Bologna Biomechanical Computed Tomography (BBCT) solution, which predicts the absolute risk of fracture at the femur for a subject. BBCT has recently been the object of a qualification advice request to the European Medicine Agency.

METHODS

The full implementation of ASME V&V40-2018 framework on BBCT is shown. Starting from BBCT proposed context of use the whole credibility plan is presented and the credibility activities (Verification, Validation, Applicability) described together with the achieved credibility levels.

RESULTS

BBCT risk is judged medium, and the credibility levels achieved considered acceptable. The uncertainties intrinsically present in the material properties assignment affected BBCT predictions to the highest extent.

CONCLUSIONS

This work provides the practical application of the ASME V&V40-2018 risk-based credibility assessment framework, which could be applied to demonstrate model credibility in any field and support future regulatory submissions and foster the adoption of In Silico Trials.

摘要

背景与目的

当计算模型的目标不仅仅是研究目的,例如为临床或监管决策提供信息时,必须相信其预测的准确性。这实际上意味着需要证明其可信度。事实上,在将计算方法用于监管目的之前,必须证明其在该范围内具有足够的可信度。由于传统上,新的医疗产品或干预措施的安全性和有效性证据是通过实验(即体内或体外)提供给监管机构的,而最近,通过计算方法来为监管决策提供信息的想法已在监管场景中得到了认可,因此,这一点变得尤为重要。虽然欧盟监管系统目前缺乏统一的技术标准,但 2018 年 ASME 发布了 V&V40-2018,其中提供了通过执行预定义可信度活动来评估计算模型可信度的基于风险的框架。这里将可信度框架应用于博洛尼亚生物力学计算机断层扫描(BBCT)解决方案,该方案预测个体股骨骨折的绝对风险。BBCT 最近成为欧洲药品管理局资格咨询请求的对象。

方法

展示了 ASME V&V40-2018 框架在 BBCT 上的完整实施。从 BBCT 提出的使用情况开始,介绍了整个可信度计划,并描述了可信度活动(验证、确认、适用性),以及所达到的可信度水平。

结果

BBCT 风险被判断为中等,所达到的可信度水平被认为是可以接受的。材料特性赋值中固有的不确定性对 BBCT 预测的影响最大。

结论

这项工作提供了 ASME V&V40-2018 基于风险的可信度评估框架的实际应用,该框架可用于证明任何领域的模型可信度,并支持未来的监管提交,促进计算试验的采用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验