Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Nov 6;33(11):1786-1793. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004528.
The implementation of a peri-operative care program based on enhanced recovery after surgery principles for minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery led to an improvement in same day discharge from 29% to 75% at our center. This study aimed to determine the program's economic impact.
Our initial enhanced recovery quality improvement program enrolled consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy at a single center during a 12-month period and compared them to a pre-intervention cohort. The primary outcome was overall costs. The secondary outcomes were surgical and post-operative visit costs. The surgical visit costs included pre-operative and operating room, post-operative stay, pharmacy, and interventions costs. The 30-day post-operative visit costs included clinic and emergency room, and readmission costs. The costs for every visit were collected from the case-cost department and expressed in 2020 Canadian dollars (CAD).
A total of 96 and 101 patients were included in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. The median total cost per patient for post-intervention was $7252 compared with $8381 pre-intervention (p=0.02), resulting in a $1129 cost reduction per patient. The total cost for the program implementation was $134 per patient for a total cost of $13 106. The median post-operative stay cost was $816 post-intervention compared with $1278 pre-intervention (p<0.05). Statistically significant savings for the post-intervention group were also found for operative visit, operating room costs, and pharmacy (p<0.05). On multivariate analysis, surgical approach was the only factor associated with operating room costs, whereas both surgical approach and group (pre- vs post-intervention) impacted the total and post-operative stay costs (p<0.05).
In addition to increasing the same day discharge rate after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery, an enhanced recovery-based peri-operative care program led to significant reductions in cost.
在我们中心,实施基于加速康复外科原则的围手术期护理方案,使微创妇科肿瘤手术的当天出院率从 29%提高到 75%。本研究旨在确定该方案的经济影响。
我们最初的强化康复质量改进计划纳入了在一个 12 个月期间在单中心接受微创子宫切除术的连续患者,并将其与干预前队列进行比较。主要结果是总体成本。次要结果是手术和术后就诊成本。手术就诊成本包括术前和手术室、术后住院、药房和干预措施成本。30 天术后就诊成本包括诊所和急诊室以及再入院成本。每次就诊的费用均从病例成本部门收集,并以 2020 年加元(CAD)表示。
干预前和干预后组分别纳入了 96 例和 101 例患者。干预后每位患者的中位总费用为 7252 加元,而干预前为 8381 加元(p=0.02),每位患者的成本降低了 1129 加元。该方案实施的总成本为每位患者 134 加元,总费用为 13106 加元。干预后患者的术后住院费用中位数为 816 加元,而干预前为 1278 加元(p<0.05)。干预后组在手术就诊、手术室费用和药房费用方面也有显著节省(p<0.05)。多变量分析显示,手术方式是手术室费用的唯一相关因素,而手术方式和组(干预前与干预后)均影响总费用和术后住院费用(p<0.05)。
除了提高微创妇科肿瘤手术后当天出院率外,基于加速康复的围手术期护理方案还显著降低了成本。