Department of English, Theatre and Creative Writing, School of Arts Birkbeck, University of London, 43 Gordon Square, LondonWC1H 0PD, UK.
Med Hist. 2023 Apr;67(2):91-108. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2023.14. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
The theory that the people of the early modern period slept in well-defined segments of 'first' and 'second' sleeps has been highly influential in both scholarly literature and mainstream media over the past twenty years. Based on a combination of scientific, anthropological and textual evidence, the segmented sleep theory has been used to illuminate discussions regarding important aspects of early modern nocturnal culture; mainstream media reports, meanwhile, have proposed segmented sleep as a potentially 'natural' and healthier alternative to consolidated blocks of sleep. In this article, I re-examine the scientific, anthropological and early modern literary sources behind the segmented sleep theory and ask if the evidence might support other models of early modern sleep that are not characterised by segmentation, while acknowledging that construction of such models is by nature limited and uncertain. I propose a more diverse range of interpretations of early modern texts related to sleep, with important implications for medical and social history and literary scholarship.
过去二十年来,关于早期现代人分阶段进行“第一”和“第二”睡眠的理论在学术文献和主流媒体中都具有高度影响力。基于科学、人类学和文本证据的综合,分段睡眠理论被用于阐明关于早期现代夜间文化重要方面的讨论;同时,主流媒体报道提出分段睡眠可能是一种更“自然”和更健康的替代整块睡眠的方式。在本文中,我重新审视了分段睡眠理论背后的科学、人类学和早期现代文学资料,并探讨这些证据是否可以支持其他非分段睡眠的早期现代睡眠模式,同时承认此类模式的构建本质上是有限且不确定的。我提出了一系列更具多样性的早期现代睡眠文本解读,这对医学史、社会史和文学研究都具有重要意义。