Ruangsillapanan Naruepol, Rattanakitkoson Tana, Chanhom Napaj, Chinvattanachot Guntarat, Piyapromdee Urawit, Leownorasate Manoon
Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, 49 Chang Phueak Road, Nai Mueang Subdistrict, Mueang Nakhon Ratchasima District, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000 Thailand.
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Jun 15;57(8):1290-1295. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00913-7. eCollection 2023 Aug.
This research aims to evaluate the reliability of modified Pauwels angle in preoperative plain X-ray and intraoperative fluoroscope.
This study included 48 male and 18 female patients with an average age of 36.95 years. Seven observers contributed to this study by measuring the modified Pauwels types and angles on 66 anterior-posterior (AP) views from preoperative radiographs and intraoperative fluorography. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability was calculated using Fleiss's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
The results showed that the intra-observer reliability for the modified Pauwels type using Kappa coefficient in preoperative and intraoperative assessments was 0.584 and 0.823, respectively. The inter-observer reliability for preoperative and intraoperative evaluations was 0.467 and 0.753 for all observers, 0.647 and 0.783 for specialized trauma orthopedists, and 0.41 and 0.752 for the residents. The modified Pauwels angle assessment in intra-observers using ICC was 0.804 preoperatively and 0.943 intraoperatively. The inter-observer for preoperative and intraoperative assessments was 0.675 and 0.834 for all observers, 0.977 and 0.982 for specialized trauma orthopedists, and 0.622 and 0.823 for residents. The difference between preoperative and intraoperative modified Pauwels angles was 9.75 ± 6.76 ( < 0.05). Eleven patients had their modified Pauwels type changed, which altered the implant selection in 8 patients.
The modified Pauwels angle together with type assessment has excellent reliability for implant selection when implemented intraoperatively, and at least two specialized trauma orthopedists should evaluate the fracture lines.
本研究旨在评估改良 Pauwels 角在术前平片和术中透视中的可靠性。
本研究纳入了 48 例男性和 18 例女性患者,平均年龄 36.95 岁。7 名观察者通过测量术前 X 光片和术中透视的 66 张前后位(AP)片上的改良 Pauwels 类型和角度参与了本研究。使用 Fleiss 卡方和组内相关系数(ICC)计算观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。
结果显示,术前和术中评估中,使用卡方系数评估改良 Pauwels 类型的观察者内可靠性分别为 0.584 和 0.823。所有观察者术前和术中评估的观察者间可靠性分别为 0.467 和 0.753,专业创伤骨科医生为 0.647 和 0.783,住院医生为 0.41 和 0.752。使用 ICC 评估观察者内改良 Pauwels 角,术前为 0.804,术中为 0.943。所有观察者术前和术中评估的观察者间为 0.675 和 0.834,专业创伤骨科医生为 0.977 和 0.982,住院医生为 0.622 和 0.823。术前和术中改良 Pauwels 角的差异为 9.75±6.76(<0.05)。11 例患者的改良 Pauwels 类型发生改变,其中 8 例患者的植入物选择因此改变。
改良 Pauwels 角及其类型评估在术中应用时对植入物选择具有良好的可靠性,且至少应由两名专业创伤骨科医生评估骨折线。