Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Injury. 2011 Nov;42(11):1238-40. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.053. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
The Pauwels classification for the femoral neck fracture is still broadly used in literature and clinical practise. However, this classification has never been tested for its reliability in terms of inter-observer agreement. We assessed whether or not it is reliable to use the Pauwels classification in pre-operative planning. Ten observers classified 100 intra-capsular femur fractures. The inter-observer agreement was calculated using the multi-rater Fleiss' kappa. The Pauwels classification showed an inter-observer agreement of κ0.31 (0.01). Classification of intra-capsular hip fractures according to the Pauwels classification using the Pauwels angle is unreliable and its use should be avoided.
Pauwels 分类法在股骨颈骨折的文献和临床实践中仍被广泛应用。然而,该分类法的观察者间一致性从未得到评估。我们评估了 Pauwels 分类法在术前计划中的可靠性。10 位观察者对 100 例囊内股骨骨折进行分类。采用多评价者 Fleiss'kappa 计算观察者间一致性。Pauwels 分类法的观察者间一致性为κ0.31(0.01)。使用 Pauwels 角对囊内髋关节骨折进行 Pauwels 分类的方法不可靠,应避免使用。