• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硬膜外穿刺-硬膜外与标准硬膜外用于择期剖宫产术硬膜外延伸对麻醉起效时间的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of Dural-Puncture Epidural vs Standard Epidural for Epidural Extension on Onset Time of Surgical Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2326710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26710.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26710
PMID:37526934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10394571/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Dural-puncture epidural (DPE) and standard epidural are common modes of neuraxial labor analgesia. Little is known about conversion of DPE-initiated labor analgesia to surgical anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether DPE provides a faster onset and better-quality block compared with the standard epidural technique for cesarean delivery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted between April 2019 and October 2022 at a tertiary care university hospital (University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences). Participants included women aged 18 years and older undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery with a singleton pregnancy.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to receive DPE or standard epidural in the labor and delivery room. A T10 sensory block was achieved and maintained using a low concentration of bupivacaine with fentanyl through the epidural catheter until the time of surgery. Epidural extension anesthesia was initiated in the operating room.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the time taken from chloroprocaine administration to surgical anesthesia (T6 sensory block). The secondary outcome was the quality of epidural anesthesia, as defined by a composite of the following factors: (1) failure to achieve a T10 bilateral block preoperatively in the delivery room, (2) failure to achieve a surgical block at T6 within 15 minutes of chloroprocaine administration, (3) requirement for intraoperative analgesia, (4) repeat neuraxial procedure, and (5) conversion to general anesthesia.

RESULTS

Among 140 women (mean [SD] age, 30.1 [5.2] years), 70 were randomized to the DPE group, and 70 were randomized to the standard epidural group. The DPE group had a faster onset time to surgical anesthesia compared with the standard epidural group (median [IQR], 422 [290-546] seconds vs 655 [437-926] seconds; median [IQR] difference, 233 [104-369] seconds). The composite rates of lower quality anesthesia were 15.7% (11 of 70 women) in the DPE group and 36.3% (24 of 66 women) in the standard epidural group (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.74; P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Anesthesia initiated following a DPE technique resulted in faster onset and improved block quality during epidural extension compared with initiation with a standard epidural technique. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in the setting of intrapartum cesarean delivery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03915574.

摘要

重要性

硬脊膜穿刺硬膜外(DPE)和标准硬膜外是常见的分娩镇痛方式。对于 DPE 诱导的分娩镇痛转为剖宫产手术麻醉,知之甚少。

目的

确定 DPE 与标准硬膜外技术相比,在剖宫产时是否具有更快的起效时间和更好的阻滞质量。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项 2019 年 4 月至 2022 年 10 月在三级保健大学医院(阿肯色大学医学科学分校)进行的双盲、随机临床试验。参与者包括年龄在 18 岁及以上、计划行剖宫产术的单胎妊娠女性。

干预措施

参与者在产房被随机分配接受 DPE 或标准硬膜外麻醉。通过硬膜外导管给予低浓度布比卡因和芬太尼,以达到 T10 感觉阻滞,并维持至手术时。在手术室开始硬膜外延伸麻醉。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是从氯普鲁卡因给药到手术麻醉(T6 感觉阻滞)的时间。次要结局是硬膜外麻醉质量,定义为以下因素的综合:(1)在产房术前未达到 T10 双侧阻滞,(2)氯普鲁卡因给药后 15 分钟内未达到 T6 手术阻滞,(3)需要术中镇痛,(4)重复行神经轴突操作,(5)转为全身麻醉。

结果

在 140 名女性(平均[标准差]年龄,30.1[5.2]岁)中,70 名被随机分配到 DPE 组,70 名被随机分配到标准硬膜外组。与标准硬膜外组相比,DPE 组的手术麻醉起效时间更快(中位数[IQR],422[290-546]秒与 655[437-926]秒;中位数[IQR]差异,233[104-369]秒)。DPE 组的麻醉质量较差的综合发生率为 15.7%(70 名女性中的 11 名),标准硬膜外组为 36.3%(66 名女性中的 24 名)(比值比,0.33;95%置信区间,0.14-0.74;P=0.007)。

结论和相关性

与标准硬膜外技术相比,DPE 技术后开始的麻醉在硬膜外延伸期间起效更快,阻滞质量更高。需要进一步的研究来确认这些发现是否适用于产时剖宫产。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03915574。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/560d/10394571/b50d02e060f8/jamanetwopen-e2326710-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/560d/10394571/68555db6c426/jamanetwopen-e2326710-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/560d/10394571/b8d26cb3c822/jamanetwopen-e2326710-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/560d/10394571/b50d02e060f8/jamanetwopen-e2326710-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/560d/10394571/68555db6c426/jamanetwopen-e2326710-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/560d/10394571/b8d26cb3c822/jamanetwopen-e2326710-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/560d/10394571/b50d02e060f8/jamanetwopen-e2326710-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Dural-Puncture Epidural vs Standard Epidural for Epidural Extension on Onset Time of Surgical Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.硬膜外穿刺-硬膜外与标准硬膜外用于择期剖宫产术硬膜外延伸对麻醉起效时间的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2326710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26710.
2
Comparison of Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine With Epinephrine, Sodium Bicarbonate, and Fentanyl for Epidural Extension Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Noninferiority Study.氯普鲁卡因与含肾上腺素、碳酸氢钠和芬太尼的利多卡因用于择期剖宫产术硬膜外延伸麻醉的比较:一项随机、三盲、非劣效性研究。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Mar 1;132(3):666-675. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005141.
3
Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial.与硬膜外麻醉和腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉技术相比,硬膜穿刺硬膜外技术可提高分娩镇痛质量且副作用更少:一项随机临床试验。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):560-569. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001798.
4
Dural puncture epidural technique provides better anesthesia quality in repeat cesarean delivery than epidural technique: Randomized controlled study.硬膜穿刺硬膜外技术在再次剖宫产中提供的麻醉质量优于硬膜外技术:随机对照研究。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jul 16;10(20):6890-6899. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i20.6890.
5
Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.硬膜外穿刺与硬膜外麻醉、硬膜外麻醉与腰硬联合麻醉用于剖宫产术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023 Jul 18;17:2077-2085. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S415684. eCollection 2023.
6
Labor Analgesia Onset With Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Traditional Epidural Using a 26-Gauge Whitacre Needle and 0.125% Bupivacaine Bolus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.硬膜外穿刺时使用 26 号 Whitacre 针和 0.125%布比卡因推注行分娩镇痛:一项随机临床试验。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):545-551. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002129.
7
Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Combined With Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus on Labor Analgesia Onset and Maintenance: A Randomized Controlled Trial.硬膜外穿刺联合程控间歇硬膜外推注分娩镇痛对产程及维持的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):971-978. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004768.
8
Quality of Labor Analgesia with Dural Puncture Epidural versus Standard Epidural Technique in Obese Parturients: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study.肥胖产妇中硬脊膜穿刺硬膜外镇痛与标准硬膜外技术的分娩镇痛质量:一项双盲随机对照研究
Anesthesiology. 2022 May 1;136(5):678-687. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004137.
9
[Effects of double-catheter epidural analgesia by lidocaine injection respectively on the delivery outcomes and maternal-infant complications for persistent posterior or lateral occipital position of protracted active phase].利多卡因分别双侧导管硬膜外注射用于活跃期持续性枕后位或枕横位分娩结局及母婴并发症的影响
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 25;55(7):457-464. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20191228-00705.
10
Neuraxial Anesthesia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report from a Large Academic Medical Center.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的椎管内麻醉:来自大型学术医疗中心的报告
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1324-e1329. doi: 10.1055/a-2008-2600. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Surgical Anesthesia Onset Between Dural-Puncture Epidural and Standard Epidural Techniques for Emergency Cesarean Section: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.硬膜外穿刺硬膜外麻醉与标准硬膜外麻醉用于急诊剖宫产手术麻醉起效时间的比较:一项随机对照试验方案
J Pain Res. 2025 May 16;18:2509-2519. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S514780. eCollection 2025.
2
Epidural analgesia for a successful vaginal delivery in a parturient with Jarcho-Levin syndrome: case report.硬膜外镇痛用于Jarcho-Levin综合征产妇成功阴道分娩:病例报告
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 5;25(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02978-3.
3
Epidural analgesia versus dural puncture epidural analgesia in labouring parturients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Dural puncture epidural technique provides better anesthesia quality in repeat cesarean delivery than epidural technique: Randomized controlled study.硬膜穿刺硬膜外技术在再次剖宫产中提供的麻醉质量优于硬膜外技术:随机对照研究。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jul 16;10(20):6890-6899. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i20.6890.
2
Dural puncture epidural versus conventional epidural analgesia for labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.硬脊膜穿刺术硬膜外与传统硬膜外镇痛用于分娩:随机对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Anesth. 2022 Jun;36(3):413-427. doi: 10.1007/s00540-022-03061-8. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
3
硬膜外镇痛与分娩产妇硬膜穿刺硬膜外镇痛的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Br J Anaesth. 2025 May;134(5):1402-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.033. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
4
A standardized algorithm for assessing labor epidural analgesia.一种评估分娩硬膜外镇痛的标准化算法。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Sep 20;37(6):914-915. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2403937. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploration of the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus volume with the dural puncture epidural technique for labour analgesia: a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study.采用硬膜穿刺硬膜外技术探索分娩镇痛的最佳程序化间歇性硬膜外推注量:一项偏倚硬币上下序贯分配研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2025 Feb;72(2):254-261. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02855-6. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
6
Regional Anaesthesia, Contemporary Techniques, and Associated Advancements: A Narrative Review.区域麻醉、现代技术及相关进展:一篇叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 26;16(7):e65477. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65477. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
The Fontan Circulation in Pregnancy: Hemodynamic Challenges and Anesthetic Considerations.妊娠与 Fontan 循环:血液动力学挑战与麻醉考虑。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 Nov;38(11):2770-2782. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.07.021. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
8
Effect of pectineus muscle plane block versus femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia and early recovery after knee surgery: a randomised controlled trial study protocol.股四头肌肌间沟阻滞与股神经阻滞对膝关节手术后镇痛和早期康复效果的随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 27;14(7):e080968. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080968.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Epidural Chloroprocaine for Breakthrough Pain During Labor Analgesia: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial.硬膜外注射氯普鲁卡因用于分娩镇痛期间爆发痛的疗效与安全性:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机试验
Pain Ther. 2024 Apr;13(2):227-239. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00577-7. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
10
Dural Puncture Epidural with 25-G Spinal Needles versus Conventional Epidural Technique in Conjunction with PIEB for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Trial.25G脊麻针硬膜穿刺硬膜外麻醉联合PIEB用于分娩镇痛与传统硬膜外技术的随机对照试验
J Pain Res. 2023 Nov 8;16:3797-3805. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S424082. eCollection 2023.
Prevention and management of intra-operative pain during caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia: a technical and interpersonal approach.
椎管内麻醉下剖宫产术中疼痛的预防和管理:一种技术和人际方法。
Anaesthesia. 2022 May;77(5):588-597. doi: 10.1111/anae.15717. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
4
Quality of Labor Analgesia with Dural Puncture Epidural versus Standard Epidural Technique in Obese Parturients: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study.肥胖产妇中硬脊膜穿刺硬膜外镇痛与标准硬膜外技术的分娩镇痛质量:一项双盲随机对照研究
Anesthesiology. 2022 May 1;136(5):678-687. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004137.
5
Onset of Action of Bupivacaine Administered via Dural Puncture Epidural versus Spinal, Lumbosacral, and Sacrococcygeal Epidural Injections in Dogs: Randomised Clinical Trial.布比卡因经硬脊膜穿刺硬膜外注射与经腰、腰骶及骶尾硬膜外注射在犬体内的起效时间:随机临床试验
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;11(10):2996. doi: 10.3390/ani11102996.
6
A randomized trial of the dural puncture epidural technique combined with programmed intermittent epidural boluses for labor analgesia.硬膜外穿刺硬膜外技术联合程序化间歇性硬膜外推注用于分娩镇痛的随机试验。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;10(1):404-414. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-2281.
7
Comparison of Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine With Epinephrine, Sodium Bicarbonate, and Fentanyl for Epidural Extension Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Noninferiority Study.氯普鲁卡因与含肾上腺素、碳酸氢钠和芬太尼的利多卡因用于择期剖宫产术硬膜外延伸麻醉的比较:一项随机、三盲、非劣效性研究。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Mar 1;132(3):666-675. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005141.
8
Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Combined With Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus on Labor Analgesia Onset and Maintenance: A Randomized Controlled Trial.硬膜外穿刺联合程控间歇硬膜外推注分娩镇痛对产程及维持的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):971-978. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004768.
9
Update on Modalities and Techniques for Labor Epidural Analgesia and Anesthesia.分娩硬膜外镇痛与麻醉的方式和技术更新
Adv Anesth. 2018 Dec;36(1):139-162. doi: 10.1016/j.aan.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
A systematic review of DURAL puncture epidural analgesia for labor.一项关于硬脊膜穿刺硬膜外镇痛用于分娩的系统评价。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Mar;53:5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.030. Epub 2018 Sep 28.