From the Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Anesth Analg. 2018 Feb;126(2):545-551. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002129.
Lumbar epidurals (LEs) provide excellent analgesia. Combined spinal epidural and dural puncture epidural (DPE) are 2 techniques to expedite neuraxial analgesia onset. In DPE, dura is punctured but medication is not administered in the cerebrospinal fluid. Expedited analgesia onset has been demonstrated with DPE, using 0.25% bupivacaine; however, this concentration may impede an unassisted vaginal birth and is not currently used for induction and maintenance of labor analgesia. The primary goal of this study was to compare the percentage of patients who achieved adequate labor analgesia following DPE or LE with an epidural bolus of 0.125% bupivacaine. Adequate labor analgesia was defined as Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measurement ≤ 10 mm on a 100-mm scale during active contractions, measured 10 minutes after epidural bolus initiation.
Laboring patients were randomly assigned to receive LE or DPE. Immediately before epidural placement, subjects marked a VAS score during an active contraction and parturients with VAS < 50 mm were excluded. The epidural space was identified by a loss of resistance technique to saline (17G Tuohy needle [Arrow International, Inc, Redding, PA]). In the DPE group, dura was punctured with a 26G Whitacre needle (Arrow International, Inc). In all participants, a 19G epidural catheter (Arrow International, Inc) was inserted. An epidural bolus was then administered over 3 minutes (12 mL, 0.125% bupivacaine, 50 μg fentanyl) followed by infusion (0.1% bupivacaine, 2 μg/mL fentanyl). After initiation of epidural bolus (time zero), VAS measurements were collected at 2-minute intervals for up to 20 minutes. Median time to achieve adequate analgesia by treatment group was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Time to achieving adequate analgesia was evaluated using a Cox regression model. All analyses were conducted in SAS version 9.4. (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) RESULTS:: Data were analyzed from 80 participants (40 per group). Adequate analgesia at 10 minutes did not differ by neuraxial technique (DPE = 55.3% vs LE = 44.7%; P= .256). However, parturients receiving DPE had shorter median times to adequate analgesia (median [95% confidence interval], 8 minutes [6-10] vs 10 minutes [8-14]) and a 67% increase in the relative risk of achieving adequate analgesia compared to LE (relative risk = 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.64; P= .042).
Although the percentage of parturients achieving adequate labor analgesia at 10 minutes after epidural bolus did not differ by technique, DPE was associated with faster time to VAS ≤ 10 mm compared with LE.
腰椎硬膜外腔(LE)可提供极佳的镇痛效果。联合脊椎-硬膜外腔穿刺和硬脊膜穿刺硬膜外腔(DPE)是两种可加速脊柱内镇痛起效的技术。在 DPE 中,硬脊膜被刺破,但药物不在脑脊液中给药。已经证明,使用 0.25%布比卡因进行 DPE 可迅速缓解疼痛;然而,这种浓度可能会阻碍无辅助的阴道分娩,目前不用于引产和维持分娩镇痛。本研究的主要目的是比较 DPE 或 LE 与 0.125%布比卡因硬膜外推注后达到充分分娩镇痛的患者比例。充分的分娩镇痛定义为硬膜外推注后 10 分钟,在主动收缩时 VAS 测量值≤10mm(100mm 刻度)。
分娩患者被随机分配接受 LE 或 DPE。在放置硬膜外导管之前,受试者在主动收缩期间标记 VAS 评分,VAS<50mm 的产妇被排除在外。硬膜外间隙通过盐水(17G Tuohy 针[Arrow International,Inc.,Redding,PA])的阻力丧失技术来识别。在 DPE 组中,使用 26G Whitacre 针(Arrow International,Inc.)刺破硬脊膜。在所有参与者中,插入 19G 硬膜外导管(Arrow International,Inc.)。然后在 3 分钟内给予硬膜外推注(12ml,0.125%布比卡因,50μg芬太尼),随后进行输注(0.1%布比卡因,2μg/ml 芬太尼)。在开始硬膜外推注(时间零)后,每隔 2 分钟收集 VAS 测量值,最长 20 分钟。通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估按治疗组达到充分镇痛的中位时间。使用 Cox 回归模型评估达到充分镇痛的时间。所有分析均在 SAS 版本 9.4(SAS Institute,Cary,NC)中进行。
对 80 名参与者(每组 40 名)的数据进行了分析。神经轴技术(DPE=55.3% vs LE=44.7%;P=0.256)对 10 分钟时的充分镇痛没有影响。然而,接受 DPE 的产妇达到充分镇痛的中位时间更短(中位数[95%置信区间],8 分钟[6-10] vs 10 分钟[8-14]),与 LE 相比,达到充分镇痛的相对风险增加了 67%(相对风险=1.67;95%置信区间,1.02-2.64;P=0.042)。
尽管硬膜外推注后 10 分钟达到充分分娩镇痛的产妇比例在两种技术之间没有差异,但与 LE 相比,DPE 与 VAS≤10mm 的时间更快。