Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Int J Med Educ. 2023 Jul 28;14:100-105. doi: 10.5116/ijme.64b4.f880.
Determine how a shift- based schedule to accommodate more students affects learning, performance, and satisfaction with the Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBG) rotation.
The study was conducted among third year OBG medical students with a triangular convergent cross-sectional approach. A new shift-based schedule was implemented. After each rotation, an online survey was conducted using a convenience sampling. Student scores on the National Board of Medical Examiner (NBME) OBG subject exam were analyzed using paired t test. Survey data was analyzed using two sample t test. The relationship between survey responses and exam score findings were described. Data from shift-schedule students was compared to traditional schedule students from the prior academic year.
A statistically significant improvement was seen for average NBME score for shift-schedule students during the beginning portion (groups 1-3) of the academic year (M=80, SD=6.9) compared to traditional (M=75.7, SD=7.3) [t =3.69, p =.001]. A similar pattern was not seen in subsequent groups (groups 4-6). Shift-schedule students also showed a statistically significant improvement in their perception of learning (t =-2.54, p =.012). Parallel results were seen for belonging, manageable workload, time to study, and engaging meaningfully. Using this model, we increased rotation capacity from 24 to 30 students per group (20%).
Shift based scheduling allows 20% increase in capacity. Exam scores and student learning outcomes were similar or better than traditional schedule controls.
确定适应更多学生的轮班时间表如何影响妇产科(OBG)轮转的学习、表现和满意度。
本研究在三年级妇产科医学生中进行,采用三角收敛横截面方法。实施了新的轮班时间表。在每次轮转后,使用方便抽样进行在线调查。使用配对 t 检验分析国家医学考试委员会(NBME)妇产科科目考试学生的成绩。使用两样本 t 检验分析调查数据。描述了调查结果与考试成绩之间的关系。将轮班时间表学生的数据与前一学年的传统时间表学生进行比较。
在学术年的开始部分(第 1-3 组),轮班时间表学生的平均 NBME 成绩(M=80,SD=6.9)与传统时间表学生(M=75.7,SD=7.3)相比有统计学显著提高(t=3.69,p=.001)。在随后的组(第 4-6 组)中没有看到类似的模式。轮班时间表学生也在学习感知方面表现出统计学上的显著提高(t=-2.54,p=.012)。归属感、可管理的工作量、学习时间和有意义的参与方面也出现了类似的结果。使用这种模式,我们将每个小组的轮转人数从 24 人增加到 30 人(增加了 20%)。
基于轮班的时间表允许增加 20%的容量。考试成绩和学生学习成果与传统时间表对照组相似或更好。