Suppr超能文献

利用路边摄像数据的多元模型研究中央分隔带行人横道的替代安全措施。

Investigating surrogate safety measures at midblock pedestrian crossings using multivariate models with roadside camera data.

机构信息

Department of Civil, Environment & Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida (UCF), Orlando, FL 32816, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Nov;192:107233. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107233. Epub 2023 Jul 30.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate and compare Surrogate Safety Measures (SSMs) at five midblock Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB) and two midblock Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons (PHB) sites in Florida using extensive video data collected over the study period of July to November 2021. Computer vision and data processing resulted in four pedestrian SSMs, namely spatial gap, temporal gap, relative time to collision (RTTC) and Post Encroachment Time (PET). An initial investigation of the SSMs using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests revealed significant differences in the SSM values across different treatment types and hours of the day. Additionally, univariate regression of spatial gap, and multivariate regression of temporal gap, RTTC and PET revealed significant differences of SSMs across RRFB and PHB sites. The study considered both linear and non-linear (gamma, inverse Gaussian and lognormal) regression models. After considering various traffic and operational parameters, the data were aggregated for each pedestrian-vehicle interaction on each lane to create a total of 395 observations. The SSMs included average spatial gap, temporal gap, RTTC and PET for each interaction of pedestrian and vehicle on each lane. The results indicated that non-linear models performed better than the linear models. Moreover, the presence of the PHB, weekday, signal activation, lane count, pedestrian speed, vehicle speed, land use mix, morning period and pedestrian starting position from the sidewalk have been found to be significant determinants of the SSMs. Results also suggest temporal SSMs increase at the PHB sites compared to the RRFB sites, indicating an improvement of traffic safety at PHB sites. However, the spatial gap decreased for PHB sites compared to the RRFB sites, which suggests that pedestrians tend to start to cross the RRFB sites when they perceive vehicles to be further away than at the PHB sites.

摘要

本研究旨在利用 2021 年 7 月至 11 月期间收集的大量视频数据,评估和比较佛罗里达州五个中央分向岛端矩形快速闪烁信号灯 (RRFB) 和两个中央分向行人混合信号灯 (PHB) 处的替代安全措施 (SSM)。计算机视觉和数据处理得出了四个行人 SSM,分别是空间间隙、时间间隙、相对碰撞时间 (RTTC) 和侵入后时间 (PET)。使用曼-惠特尼-威尔科克森检验对 SSM 进行初步调查,结果表明,不同处理类型和一天中的不同时间,SSM 值存在显著差异。此外,空间间隙的单变量回归和时间间隙、RTTC 和 PET 的多变量回归表明,SSM 在 RRFB 和 PHB 处存在显著差异。该研究考虑了线性和非线性 (伽马、逆高斯和对数正态) 回归模型。在考虑了各种交通和运营参数后,将每个车道上每个行人和车辆之间的行人-车辆相互作用的数据进行了汇总,共得到 395 个观测值。SSM 包括每个车道上每个行人和车辆相互作用的平均空间间隙、时间间隙、RTTC 和 PET。结果表明,非线性模型比线性模型表现更好。此外,PHB 的存在、工作日、信号激活、车道数量、行人速度、车辆速度、土地利用混合、早高峰时段以及行人从人行道开始的位置,均被发现是 SSM 的重要决定因素。结果还表明,与 RRFB 相比,PHB 处的时间 SSM 增加,这表明 PHB 处的交通安全得到了改善。然而,与 RRFB 相比,PHB 处的空间间隙减小,这表明行人在 PHB 处感觉车辆距离更远时,更倾向于开始穿越 RRFB 处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验