School of Nursing, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;69(8):2018-2030. doi: 10.1177/00207640231188321. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
In the pandemic era, stressful life events (StressLEv) aggravated the impact on mental health. However, youths exhibited different responses to StressLEv because of diverse coping strategies, social support, and emotional intelligence before and after the pandemic.
To explore the changes in StressLEv and coping strategies before and after the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, as well as report the associations among mental health and related factors in a sample of Chinese youths experiencing the post-pandemic era.
A cross-sectional study using convenience sampling was conducted from July 1 to August 30, 2022, covering 3,038 youths aged 14 to 25 in China. Multiple logistic regression was conducted for crude odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted ORs. The relationships between lasso-selected variables was examined using structural equation modeling.
More StressLEv and limited coping strategies were reported after the pandemic. In the post-pandemic era, BSI-positive youths (youths diagnosed as considered case by Brief Symptom Inventory, BSI) reported more StressLEv (BSI-positive: mean = 75.47; BSI-negative: mean = 28.69), less social support (BSI-positive: mean = 31.81; BSI-negative: mean = 39.22), and lower emotional intelligence (BSI-positive: mean = 75.34; BSI-negative: mean = 89.42). The willingness to engage in mental health counseling (OR: no vs. yes: 1.89; uncertain vs. yes: 4.42), being punished (OR: 1.27), adaptation problems (OR: 1.06), task-oriented coping (OR: 0.95), social diversion coping (OR: 0.90), objective support (OR: 0.90), utilization of social support (OR: 0.81), and regulation of emotion in oneself (OR: 0.94) were associated with mental health. Structural equation modeling supported our theoretical framework.
Pandemic-induced mental health problems should not be ignored. The proposed response mechanisms could guide the development of effective interventions, which can help youths better cope with StressLEv and maintain good mental health.
在大流行时代,压力生活事件(StressLEv)加重了对心理健康的影响。然而,由于大流行前后不同的应对策略、社会支持和情绪智力,年轻人对 StressLEv 的反应不同。
探讨新冠肺炎大流行前后压力生活事件和应对策略的变化,并报告在经历后疫情时代的中国青年样本中,心理健康及相关因素之间的关联。
采用便利抽样,于 2022 年 7 月 1 日至 8 月 30 日进行横断面研究,共纳入中国 14 至 25 岁的 3038 名青年。采用多因素逻辑回归分析进行粗比值比(OR)和调整 OR。采用结构方程模型检验lasso 选择变量之间的关系。
大流行后报告的压力生活事件更多,应对策略有限。在后疫情时代,BSI 阳性(被 Brief Symptom Inventory,BSI 诊断为考虑病例)青年报告的压力生活事件更多(BSI 阳性:均值=75.47;BSI 阴性:均值=28.69),社会支持较少(BSI 阳性:均值=31.81;BSI 阴性:均值=39.22),情绪智力较低(BSI 阳性:均值=75.34;BSI 阴性:均值=89.42)。愿意进行心理健康咨询(OR:否 vs. 是:1.89;不确定 vs. 是:4.42)、被惩罚(OR:1.27)、适应问题(OR:1.06)、任务导向应对(OR:0.95)、社会转移应对(OR:0.90)、客观支持(OR:0.90)、社会支持利用(OR:0.81)、自我情绪调节(OR:0.94)与心理健康有关。结构方程模型支持我们的理论框架。
不应忽视大流行引起的心理健康问题。提出的应对机制可以指导制定有效的干预措施,帮助年轻人更好地应对压力生活事件,保持良好的心理健康。