• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Domain and perception on community resilience: comparison between two countries.社区韧性的领域和认知:两个国家的比较。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 17;11:1157837. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1157837. eCollection 2023.
2
The Relationship between Capital Domains and Resilience in Facing the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia.印尼应对新冠疫情中资本领域与韧性的关系。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2023 May;33(3):391-402. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v33i3.2.
3
The Communities Advancing Resilience Toolkit (CART): an intervention to build community resilience to disasters.社区韧性提升工具包(CART):一项用于增强社区灾害韧性的干预措施。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 May-Jun;19(3):250-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318268aed8.
4
Responding to everyday problems and crises: Measuring community resilience.应对日常问题与危机:衡量社区恢复力
J Community Psychol. 2023 May;51(4):1560-1570. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22933. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
The Communities Advancing Resilience Toolkit (CART): development of a survey instrument to assess community resilience.社区抗逆力提升工具包(CART):一种用于评估社区抗逆力的调查工具的开发
Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2013;15(1):15-29.
6
The association between social cohesion and community disaster resilience: A cross-sectional study.社会凝聚力与社区灾害恢复力之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 May;27(3):621-631. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12674. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
7
The community resilience measurement throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond -an empirical study based on data from Shanghai, Wuhan and Chengdu.新冠疫情期间及之后的社区恢复力测量——基于上海、武汉和成都数据的实证研究
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Jan;67:102664. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102664. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
8
Assessing community resilience: A CART survey application in an impoverished urban community.评估社区恢复力:CART 调查在贫困城市社区的应用
Disaster Health. 2016 May 13;3(2):45-56. doi: 10.1080/21665044.2016.1189068. eCollection 2016.
9
Exploring People's Perception of COVID-19 Risk: A Case Study of Greater Jakarta, Indonesia.探索人们对 COVID-19 风险的认知:印度尼西亚大雅加达地区的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 26;20(1):336. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010336.
10
Disaster impacts, resilience, and sustainability opportunities for Gili Trawangan, Indonesia: transdisciplinary reflections following COVID-19.印度尼西亚吉利特拉旺安岛的灾害影响、恢复力和可持续发展机遇:COVID-19 后的跨学科思考。
Disasters. 2023 Apr;47(2):499-518. doi: 10.1111/disa.12554. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
: An ethnography of patients and families navigating palliative care in a resource-limited setting.资源有限环境下患者及其家庭接受姑息治疗的人种志研究
Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;39(1):139-150. doi: 10.1177/02692163241287640. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Dynamic assessment of community resilience in China: empirical surveys from three provinces.中国社区韧性的动态评估:来自三个省份的实证调查。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 19;12:1378723. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1378723. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Building community resilience beyond COVID-19: The Singapore way.超越新冠疫情构建社区复原力:新加坡模式。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Feb;7:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100091. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
2
Gotong Royong as social capital to overcome micro and small enterprises' capital difficulties.互助合作作为社会资本来克服小微企业的资金困难。
Heliyon. 2020 Sep 14;6(9):e04879. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04879. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Measuring psychological resilience to disasters: are evidence-based indicators an achievable goal?衡量对灾难的心理复原力:基于证据的指标是一个可实现的目标吗?
Environ Health. 2013 Dec 20;12:115. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-115.
4
Taking the terror out of bioterrorism: planning for a bioterrorist event from a local perspective.消除生物恐怖主义的恐惧:从地方视角规划生物恐怖主义事件应对方案
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2000 Jul;6(4):1-7. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200006040-00003.

社区韧性的领域和认知:两个国家的比较。

Domain and perception on community resilience: comparison between two countries.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia.

Department of Bussiness and Civil Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 17;11:1157837. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1157837. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1157837
PMID:37529438
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10387521/
Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak demonstrates how unprepared the world is for a different type of crisis, especially non-physical calamities. Revitalizing community involvement in disaster management is essential for making a community resilient. Due to differing sociocultural contexts, the resilience perceptions of communities in different parts of the world may vary. This study aims to understand community resilience factors after the COVID-19 disaster in Indonesia and Malaysia. Data from 2034 questionnaires using 5-interrelated domains in the Communities Advancing Resilience (CART) Toolkit Survey were collected. This study was conducted across Indonesia and Malaysia from March to April 2022. A quantitative-based cross-sectional study design and convenience sampling were applied. Respondents for this study were Indonesian and Malaysian citizens above 18 years of age who met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2034 respondents, 715 from Indonesia and 1,315 from Malaysia responded to the survey. The results suggest that Indonesian and Malaysian communities' Transformative Potential and Informative-Communication domains differ significantly. Indonesian communities demonstrated a higher mean value on Transformative Potential domains than Malaysian communities did, while Malaysian communities indicated a higher mean value on Informative-Communication domains. This study concludes that compared to Malaysian communities, Indonesian communities have a more significant potential for transformation because they can frame collective experiences, gather, and analyze pertinent data, evaluate community performance, and develop resilience-building abilities. On the other hand, Malaysian communities are more resilient in providing information and communication. We found the need to develop a community resilience model that incorporates specific cultural and local requirements. Cooperation between the two countries would open many possibilities to emphasize the capability to bounce back sooner after a catastrophe such as the COVID-19 pandemic and achieve Sustainable Development Goals.

摘要

新冠疫情大流行表明,世界对不同类型的危机,尤其是非物理性灾难,毫无准备。重振社区参与灾害管理对于提高社区的韧性至关重要。由于社会文化背景不同,世界不同地区社区的韧性认知可能有所不同。本研究旨在了解印尼和马来西亚新冠疫情后的社区韧性因素。本研究使用社区韧性提升工具包调查中的 5 个相互关联的领域,共收集了 2034 份问卷的数据。本研究于 2022 年 3 月至 4 月在印尼和马来西亚进行。采用定量的横断面研究设计和便利抽样方法。本研究的受访者为 18 岁以上的印尼和马来西亚公民,符合纳入标准。共有 2034 名受访者,其中 715 名来自印尼,1315 名来自马来西亚,他们对调查做出了回应。结果表明,印尼和马来西亚社区的变革潜力和信息交流领域存在显著差异。印尼社区在变革潜力领域的平均得分高于马来西亚社区,而马来西亚社区在信息交流领域的平均得分高于印尼社区。本研究得出结论,与马来西亚社区相比,印尼社区具有更大的变革潜力,因为他们能够构建集体经验、收集和分析相关数据、评估社区绩效以及发展韧性建设能力。另一方面,马来西亚社区在提供信息和交流方面更具韧性。我们发现有必要制定一种社区韧性模型,将特定的文化和地方需求纳入其中。两国之间的合作将为强调在新冠疫情等灾难后更快恢复的能力并实现可持续发展目标提供许多可能性。