Suppr超能文献

黄体期刺激起始日对双刺激周期的影响。

Influence of the starting day of luteal phase stimulation on double stimulation cycles.

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Medicine, Instituto Bernabeu, Alicante, Spain.

Department of Reproductive Medicine, Instituto Bernabeu Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 13;14:1216671. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1216671. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Double ovarian stimulation is one of the most used strategies in poor-prognosis patients. There is a high heterogeneity between the studies regarding the execution of this stimulation protocol. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the day on which luteal phase stimulation begins after the first oocyte retrieval affects ovarian response in DuoStim cycles.

METHODS

This observational and retrospective study included 541 DuoStim cycles between January 2018 and December 2021 in a private fertility clinic. Patients were assigned to 4 groups according to the timing of the onset of luteal phase stimulation after oocyte retrieval (0-2 day, 3 day, 4 day and 5-6 day). The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved in the luteal phase in each group.

RESULTS

No differences were found between groups in the number of oocytes collected (5.12 ± 3.56 vs. 5.39 ± 3.74 vs. 5.61 ± 3.94 vs. 5.89 ± 3.92; p=0,6), MII or number of follicles. An increase in the duration of stimulation was found when stimulation started on the 4 day (10.42 ± 2.31 vs. 10.68 ± 2.37 vs. 11.27 ± 2.40 vs. 10.65 ± 2.37 days, p=0,033). A lower number of fertilized oocytes was observed when stimulation began before the fourth day (3.36 ± 2.80 vs. 3.95 ± 2.53 vs. 4.03 ± 2.73 vs. 4.48 ± 3.11; p=0,036). The number of blastocysts was higher when the stimulation started 5-6 days after retrieval (1.82 ± 1.74 vs. 2.13 ± 1.61 vs. 2.33 ± 2.06 vs. 2.91 ± 2.39; p= 0,030).

DISCUSSION

The number of oocytes retrieved does not differ depending on the day that stimulation begins. However, oocytes competence in terms of fertilized oocytes and blastulation, appears to be lower when the second stimulation starts before the fourth day after oocyte retrieval.

摘要

背景

双卵巢刺激是预后不良患者最常用的策略之一。关于这种刺激方案的执行,研究之间存在很高的异质性。本研究的目的是探讨第一次取卵后黄体期刺激开始的日期是否会影响 DuoStim 周期中的卵巢反应。

方法

这是一项观察性和回顾性研究,纳入了 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月在一家私立生育诊所进行的 541 例 DuoStim 周期。根据取卵后黄体期刺激开始的时间(第 0-2 天、第 3 天、第 4 天和第 5-6 天)将患者分为 4 组。主要结局是每组黄体期采集的卵母细胞数量。

结果

各组采集的卵母细胞数量(5.12 ± 3.56 vs. 5.39 ± 3.74 vs. 5.61 ± 3.94 vs. 5.89 ± 3.92;p=0.6)、MII 或卵泡数量均无差异。当刺激在第 4 天开始时,刺激持续时间增加(10.42 ± 2.31 vs. 10.68 ± 2.37 vs. 11.27 ± 2.40 vs. 10.65 ± 2.37 天,p=0.033)。当刺激在第四天之前开始时,受精卵母细胞的数量减少(3.36 ± 2.80 vs. 3.95 ± 2.53 vs. 4.03 ± 2.73 vs. 4.48 ± 3.11;p=0.036)。当刺激在取卵后 5-6 天开始时,囊胚数量较高(1.82 ± 1.74 vs. 2.13 ± 1.61 vs. 2.33 ± 2.06 vs. 2.91 ± 2.39;p=0.030)。

讨论

刺激开始的日期与采集的卵母细胞数量无关。然而,当第二次刺激在取卵后第四天之前开始时,受精卵母细胞和囊胚形成的能力似乎较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b931/10390300/771b8758ac6b/fendo-14-1216671-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验