Deparment of general Practice and Primary Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Dec;38(23-24):11999-12024. doi: 10.1177/08862605231190340. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
Technology-facilitated abuse in relationships (TAR) is a widespread social problem that has a significant impact on victim-survivors. Most contemporary evidence on TAR focuses on victim-survivor and practitioner perspectives rather than those of perpetrators who choose to enact this form of harm. Addressing this deficit, this study explored perpetrators' discourses on emotions and motivations associated with engaging in TAR. Using story completion method, 35 self-identified perpetrators of TAR completed story stems describing scenarios that may precede the use of abusive online behaviors. Reflexive thematic analysis generated three themes. speaks to maladaptive experiences of anger and/or sadness that can precede a decision to use TAR. describes potential motives for using TAR. Finally, investigates rationales perpetrators use for avoidance of TAR behaviors, suggesting avenues for working with perpetrators to refrain from using TAR. We conclude by discussing policy, practice, and research recommendations including strategies for technology designers and suggestions for primary prevention and response to TAR.
关系中的技术促成的虐待(TAR)是一个广泛存在的社会问题,对受害者幸存者有重大影响。大多数关于 TAR 的当代证据都集中在受害者幸存者和从业者的观点上,而不是选择实施这种形式的伤害的施害者的观点上。为了弥补这一不足,本研究探讨了施害者对与参与 TAR 相关的情绪和动机的论述。使用故事完成方法,35 名自我认同的 TAR 施害者完成了描述可能先于使用虐待性在线行为的情景的故事干。反思性主题分析产生了三个主题。第 部分探讨了可能先于决定使用 TAR 的愤怒和/或悲伤的适应不良经历。第 部分描述了使用 TAR 的潜在动机。最后,第 部分探讨了施害者用于避免 TAR 行为的理由,为与施害者合作避免使用 TAR 提供了途径。我们最后讨论了政策、实践和研究建议,包括技术设计者的策略以及 TAR 的初级预防和应对建议。