Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Division of Biostatistics and Health Services Research, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Nov;71(11):3390-3402. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18519. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
The comparative safety of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) as adjuvants to short-acting opioids in older adults is unknown even though SNRIs are commonly used. We compared the effects of SNRIs versus nonsteroidal anti-Inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on delirium among nursing home residents when SNRIs or NSAIDs were added to stable regimens of short-acting opioids.
Using 2011-2016 national Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 and Medicare claims data to implement a new-user design, we identified a cohort of nursing home residents receiving short-acting opioids who initiated either an SNRI or an NSAID. Delirium was defined from the Confusion Assessment Method in MDS 3.0 assessments and ICD9/10 codes using Medicare hospitalization claims. Propensity score matching balanced underlying differences for initiating treatments on 39 demographic and clinical characteristics (n = 5350; n = 5350). Fine and Gray models provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for the competing risk of death.
Hydrocodone was the most commonly used short-acting opioid (48%). Residents received ~23 mg daily oral morphine equivalent at the time of SNRIs/NSAIDs initiation. The majority were women, non-Hispanic White, and aged ≥75 years. There were no differences in any of the confounders after propensity matching. Over 1 year, 10.8% of SNRIs initiators and 8.9% of NSAIDs initiators developed delirium. The rate of delirium onset was similar in SNRIs and NSAID initiators (HR(delirium in nursing home or hospitalization for delirium):1.10; 95% CI: 0.97-1.24; HR(hospitalization for delirium): 1.06; 95% CI: 0.89-1.25), and were similar regardless of baseline opioid daily dosage.
Among nursing home residents, adding SNRIs to short-acting opioids does not appear to increase risk of delirium relative to initiating NSAIDs. Understanding the comparative safety of pain regimens is needed to inform clinical decisions in a medically complex population often excluded from clinical research.
尽管血清素和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)常用于辅助短期阿片类药物,但它们在老年人中的相对安全性尚不清楚。当 SNRIs 或 NSAIDs 加入稳定的短期阿片类药物治疗方案时,我们比较了 SNRIs 与非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)对养老院居民谵妄的影响。
使用 2011-2016 年全国最低数据集(MDS)3.0 和医疗保险索赔数据实施新用户设计,我们确定了一个接受短期阿片类药物治疗的养老院居民队列,他们开始使用 SNRI 或 NSAID。谵妄使用 MDS 3.0 评估中的意识混乱评估方法和 ICD9/10 代码来定义,并使用医疗保险住院索赔进行确认。倾向评分匹配平衡了 39 项人口统计学和临床特征(n=5350;n=5350)的起始治疗差异。精细和灰色模型提供了风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI),以调整死亡的竞争风险。
氢可酮是最常用的短期阿片类药物(48%)。居民在开始使用 SNRIs/NSAIDs 时每天接受约 23mg 口服吗啡等效物。大多数是女性、非西班牙裔白人且年龄≥75 岁。在倾向匹配后,没有任何混杂因素存在差异。在 1 年内,10.8%的 SNRI 起始者和 8.9%的 NSAID 起始者发生谵妄。SNRI 和 NSAID 起始者的谵妄发病速度相似(发生谵妄的养老院或因谵妄住院的 HR:1.10;95%CI:0.97-1.24;因谵妄住院的 HR:1.06;95%CI:0.89-1.25),且与基线阿片类药物日剂量无关。
在养老院居民中,与起始 NSAIDs 相比,将 SNRIs 添加到短期阿片类药物中似乎不会增加谵妄的风险。在经常被排除在临床研究之外的复杂医学人群中,为了告知临床决策,需要了解疼痛方案的相对安全性。