• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较鸡粪和猪粪堆肥过程中细菌和真菌群落结构和动态变化。

Comparison of bacterial and fungal communities structure and dynamics during chicken manure and pig manure composting.

机构信息

Department of Biology and Biochemistry, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing East Road, 71, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China.

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 101400, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(41):94347-94360. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29056-w. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-023-29056-w
PMID:37531050
Abstract

Composting is a sustainable and eco-friendly technology that turns animal waste into organic fertilizers. It remains unclear whether differences exist in the structure of microbial communities during different livestock manure composting. This study analyzed the dynamic change of bacterial and fungal communities, metabolic function, and trophic mode during chicken manure (CM) and pig manure (PM) composting based on 16S rRNA and ITS sequencing. Environmental factors were investigated for their impact on microbial communities. During composting, bacterial diversity decreased and then increased, while fungal diversity slightly increased and then decreased. Saccharomonospora and Aspergillus were the dominant genera and key microorganisms in CM and PM, respectively, which played crucial roles in sustaining the stability of the ecological network structure in the microbial ecology and participating in metabolism. Saccharomonospora gradually increased, while Aspergillus increased at first and then decreased. PM had better microbial community stability and more keystone taxa than CM. In CM and PM, the primary function of bacterial communities was metabolism, while saprotroph was the primary trophic mode of fungal communities. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was the primary factor influencing the structure and function of microbial communities in CM and PM. In addition to DOC, pH and moisture were important factors affecting the fungal communities in CM and PM, respectively. These results show that the succession of bacteria and fungi in CM and PM proceeded in a similar pattern, but there are still some differences in the dominant genus and their responses to environmental factors.

摘要

堆肥是一种可持续且环保的技术,可将动物粪便转化为有机肥料。目前尚不清楚在不同的牲畜粪便堆肥过程中微生物群落的结构是否存在差异。本研究基于 16S rRNA 和 ITS 测序,分析了鸡粪(CM)和猪粪(PM)堆肥过程中细菌和真菌群落的动态变化、代谢功能和营养方式。研究了环境因素对微生物群落的影响。在堆肥过程中,细菌多样性先减少后增加,真菌多样性先增加后减少。糖单孢菌属和曲霉属分别是 CM 和 PM 的优势属和关键微生物,在维持微生物生态学中生态网络结构的稳定性和参与代谢方面发挥着关键作用。糖单孢菌属逐渐增加,而曲霉属先增加后减少。PM 的微生物群落稳定性和关键类群比 CM 更好。在 CM 和 PM 中,细菌群落的主要功能是代谢,而真菌群落的主要营养方式是腐生。溶解性有机碳(DOC)是影响 CM 和 PM 微生物群落结构和功能的主要因素。除了 DOC 外,pH 和水分分别是影响 CM 和 PM 真菌群落的重要因素。这些结果表明,CM 和 PM 中细菌和真菌的演替过程相似,但在优势属及其对环境因素的响应方面仍存在一些差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of bacterial and fungal communities structure and dynamics during chicken manure and pig manure composting.比较鸡粪和猪粪堆肥过程中细菌和真菌群落结构和动态变化。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(41):94347-94360. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29056-w. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
[Dynamic Changes in Antibiotic Resistance Genes During Biological Fermentation of Chicken Manure and Pig Manure].鸡粪和猪粪生物发酵过程中抗生素抗性基因的动态变化
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Mar 8;44(3):1780-1791. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202204215.
3
Difference responses of soil fungal communities to cattle and chicken manure composting application.土壤真菌群落对牛粪和鸡粪堆肥施用的差异响应。
J Appl Microbiol. 2022 Aug;133(2):323-339. doi: 10.1111/jam.15549. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
4
Metabolic function, trophic mode, organics degradation ability and influence factor of bacterial and fungal communities in chicken manure composting.鸡粪堆肥中细菌和真菌群落的代谢功能、营养方式、有机物降解能力及影响因素。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Apr;302:122883. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122883. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Compositional and functional succession of bacterial and fungal communities is associated with changes in abiotic properties during pig manure composting.细菌和真菌群落的组成和功能演替与猪粪堆肥过程中生物物理性质的变化有关。
Waste Manag. 2021 Jul 15;131:350-358. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.06.023. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
6
Comparison of bacterial community structure and dynamics during the thermophilic composting of different types of solid wastes: anaerobic digestion residue, pig manure and chicken manure.不同类型固体废物(厌氧消化残渣、猪粪和鸡粪)高温堆肥过程中细菌群落结构与动态的比较。
Microb Biotechnol. 2014 Sep;7(5):424-33. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12131. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
7
Optimization of vegetable waste composting and the exploration of microbial mechanisms related to fungal communities during composting.优化蔬菜废弃物堆肥,并在堆肥过程中探索与真菌群落相关的微生物机制。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 1;319:115694. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115694. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
8
Role of fungal communities and their interaction with bacterial communities on carbon and nitrogen component transformation in composting with different phosphate additives.不同磷酸盐添加剂堆肥中真菌群落的作用及其与细菌群落对碳氮组分转化的相互作用
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):44112-44120. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25430-w. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
9
Regulation of fungal communities during pig manure composting.调控猪粪堆肥过程中的真菌群落。
Bioresour Technol. 2023 Dec;389:129823. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129823. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
10
Characteristics of bacterial and fungal communities and their impact during cow manure and agroforestry biowaste co-composting.牛粪与农林业生物废弃物共堆肥过程中细菌和真菌群落的特征及其影响
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 15;324:116377. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116377. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Thermophilic microbial agents promote the fermentation progression of spent mushroom compost and pig manure.嗜热微生物制剂促进了蘑菇废料和猪粪的发酵进程。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1575397. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1575397. eCollection 2025.