Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei, China.
Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Bahçeşehir Cyprus University, Nicosia, Turkey.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(41):94242-94254. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29017-3. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
The rising urban population and accelerated resource consumption pose major environmental challenges. Given that around 75% of global resources are consumed in urban areas, understanding the true association between urbanization (UR) and ecological quality is necessary for better urban strategies. Alongside this, eco-innovation (ECO) can limit environmental pollution and thus, it is the cornerstone of environmental policies. On that note, this research discloses the nexus between eco-innovation, economic growth (EGR), and ecological quality by considering the non-linear effects of UR in the emerging seven (E-7) nations from 1992 to 2018. Unlike previous literature, the newly developed indicator of ecological quality (the load capacity factor (LCF)) is adopted to understand the connection between UR, eco-innovation, and ecological quality since this new comprehensive indicator is based on both biocapacity and ecological footprint (EF). In the methodology, the "Continuously Updated-Fully Modified" (CuP-FM) test is used since this method offers diverse benefits for panel data estimation by accounting for major panel data estimation issues including autocorrelation, endogeneity, heteroscedasticity, fractional integration, and cross-sectional dependence. The empirical estimates unveiled that the current levels as well as high levels of UR limit the LCF. This evidence suggests that UR in the E-7 nations expands ecological degradation. This finding contradicts the assertions of ecological modernization theory that expanding urbanization brings some ecological benefits. Similarly, economic growth alleviates ecological quality. However, eco-innovation and agricultural land (AGL) contribute to enhancing the LCF and promoting ecological quality. Further, UR and eco-innovation Granger cause the LCF. Lastly, comprehensive urban environmental strategies are discussed to promote sustainable urbanization backed by eco-innovation.
不断增长的城市人口和加速的资源消耗带来了重大的环境挑战。鉴于全球约 75%的资源都在城市地区消耗,因此了解城市化(UR)与生态质量之间的真实关联对于制定更好的城市战略是必要的。与此同时,生态创新(ECO)可以限制环境污染,因此它是环境政策的基石。有鉴于此,本研究通过考虑到新兴七国集团(E-7 国家)1992 年至 2018 年期间城市化的非线性效应,揭示了生态创新、经济增长(EGR)和生态质量之间的关系。与以往的文献不同,采用了新开发的生态质量指标(承载能力系数(LCF))来理解城市化、生态创新和生态质量之间的联系,因为这个新的综合指标是基于生物容量和生态足迹(EF)的。在方法上,采用了“持续更新-完全修正”(CuP-FM)检验,因为这种方法通过考虑面板数据估计中的主要问题,包括自相关、内生性、异方差、分数整合和横截面依赖性,为面板数据估计提供了多种好处。实证估计结果表明,当前和高水平的城市化限制了 LCF。这一证据表明,E-7 国家的城市化扩大了生态退化。这一发现与生态现代化理论的断言相矛盾,该理论认为扩大城市化会带来一些生态效益。同样,经济增长也会改善生态质量。然而,生态创新和农业用地(AGL)有助于提高 LCF 并促进生态质量。此外,城市化和生态创新会引起 LCF 的格兰杰因果关系。最后,讨论了综合城市环境战略,以促进以生态创新为后盾的可持续城市化。