• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性胆总管结石的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wen Ningyuan, Wang Yaoqun, Cai Yulong, Nie Guilin, Yang Sishu, Wang Shaofeng, Xiong Xianze, Li Bei, Lu Jiong, Cheng Nansheng

机构信息

Division of Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Research Center for Biliary Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jul-Dec;17(9):937-947. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784
PMID:37531090
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Common bile duct stones (CBDS) have a reported recurrence rate of 4%-24% after stone extraction. The most commonly applied stone extraction method is endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all available risk factors for recurrent CBDS following stone retraction.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A literature search of studies with case-control design was performed to identify potential risk factors for recurrent CBDS. The impact of different risk factors on stone recurrence was analyzed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and heterogeneity were calculated. Identified risk factors were graded as 'strong,' 'moderate,' or 'weak' after quality assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 46 studies discussing stone recurrence following ERCP treatment were included. CBD diameter1.5 cm, sharp CBD angulation, multiple ERCP sessions, postoperative pneumobilia, history of CBD incision, and biliary stent placement were identified as strong risk factors; larger CBD diameter, periampullary diverticulum, mechanical lithotripsy, and history of cholecystectomy were identified as moderate. Other weak risk factors were also listed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this comprehensive study, we identified 14 risk/protective factors for recurrent CBDS following ERCP. Pooled odds ratios were calculated and evaluated the quality of evidence. These findings may shed light on the assessment and management of CBDS.

摘要

背景

据报道,胆总管结石(CBDS)取石术后复发率为4%-24%。最常用的取石方法是内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定结石取出后复发性CBDS的所有可用危险因素。

研究设计与方法

对采用病例对照设计的研究进行文献检索,以确定复发性CBDS的潜在危险因素。分析了不同危险因素对结石复发的影响。计算了合并比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)和异质性。在质量评估后,将确定的危险因素分为“强”、“中”或“弱”等级。

结果

共纳入46项讨论ERCP治疗后结石复发的研究。胆总管直径≥1.5 cm、胆总管锐角、多次ERCP操作、术后气腹、胆总管切开史和胆管支架置入被确定为强危险因素;胆总管直径较大、壶腹周围憩室、机械碎石术和胆囊切除术史被确定为中度危险因素。还列出了其他弱危险因素。

结论

在这项综合性研究中,我们确定了ERCP术后复发性CBDS的14个风险/保护因素。计算了合并比值比并评估了证据质量。这些发现可能有助于胆总管结石的评估和管理。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.复发性胆总管结石的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jul-Dec;17(9):937-947. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct.腹腔镜 - 内镜会师术与术前内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆囊和胆管结石行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 11;4(4):CD010507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010507.pub2.
3
NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy.美国国立卫生研究院关于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)用于诊断和治疗的科学现状声明。
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19(1):1-26.
4
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub2.
5
Endoscopic Treatment of Large Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.内镜治疗胆总管大结石:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jan;21(1):33-44.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
6
Guidewire-assisted cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis.导丝辅助胆总管插管预防内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)后胰腺炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD009662. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009662.pub3.
7
Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis.用于胆道插管的胰管导丝置入术预防内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)术后胰腺炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 16;2016(5):CD010571. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010571.pub2.
8
Minimally invasive management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: an updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的微创治疗:随机对照试验的最新网状Meta分析
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1683-1693. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09723-8. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
9
Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct.内镜括约肌切开术与腹腔镜胆总管探查术的比较。
Br J Surg. 2002 Dec;89(12):1495-504. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02291.x.
10
Evaluation of risk factors for recurrent primary common bile duct stone in patients with cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术后复发性原发性胆总管结石患者危险因素的评估
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;53(4):466-470. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1438507. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Peroral cholangioscopy for detecting residual stones missed by cholangiography: Systematic review and meta-analysis.经口胆管镜检查用于检测胆管造影遗漏的残留结石:系统评价与荟萃分析
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Aug 26;13:a26764062. doi: 10.1055/a-2676-4062. eCollection 2025.
2
Is the Success Rate of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ± Sphincterotomy Done for Bile Duct Stones Optimal?针对胆管结石进行的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)±括约肌切开术的成功率是否达到最佳?
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09333-z.
3
The gut microbiota features and the application value in predicting recurrent risks for gallstone patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的胆结石患者肠道微生物群特征及其在预测复发风险中的应用价值。
mSystems. 2025 Aug 19;10(8):e0176024. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01760-24. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
4
Rare recurrence of common bile duct calculi post T-tube cholangiography: A case report.T管胆管造影术后胆总管结石罕见复发:一例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2025 Jul 16;13(20):102695. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i20.102695.
5
Risk Factors for Common Bile Duct Stones in Patients with Previous Cholecystectomy: A Multicenter Prospective Proof-of-Concept Study.既往胆囊切除术后患者胆总管结石的危险因素:一项多中心前瞻性概念验证研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 26;14(13):4532. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134532.
6
Long-term prognosis and risk factors associated with 30-day unplanned repeated ERCP in patients with common bile duct stones.胆总管结石患者30天内非计划性重复内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的长期预后及相关危险因素
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 9;18:17562848251342342. doi: 10.1177/17562848251342342. eCollection 2025.
7
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation, and laparoscopic hepatectomy for intra- and extrahepatic bile duct stones.内镜逆行胰胆管造影、内镜乳头球囊扩张术及腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝内和肝外胆管结石
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jan 27;17(1):100544. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.100544.
8
Modern Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Breakthroughs, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.胆总管结石的现代管理:突破、挑战与未来展望。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 6;16(12):e75246. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75246. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Association between weight-adjusted-waist index and the prevalence of gallstone disease in Minhang District, Shanghai: a cross-sectional study.上海市闵行区体重校正腰围指数与胆结石病患病率的关联:一项横断面研究
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Jan 2;44(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00731-z.
10
Risk Factors for Gallstones in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.克罗恩病患者发生胆结石的风险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Nov;69(11):4187-4202. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08597-1. Epub 2024 Sep 25.