• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对胆管结石进行的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)±括约肌切开术的成功率是否达到最佳?

Is the Success Rate of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ± Sphincterotomy Done for Bile Duct Stones Optimal?

作者信息

Debora Ciprani, Hoda Amar, Majd Abusharar, Trisha Lopes, Rahi Karmarkar, Ahmed Almadi, Somaiah Aroori

机构信息

Peninsula HPB Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, England, UK.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09333-z.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-025-09333-z
PMID:40880002
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the standard treatment for bile duct stones (BDS). While reported success rates often exceed 80%, the literature rarely distinguishes between success at the index ERCP and cumulative success across multiple procedures. Moreover, definitions of ERCP success vary significantly.

AIM

This study evaluates the index ERCP's success rates according to pre-defined criteria.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all ERCPs performed for BDS before cholecystectomy at University Hospitals Plymouth (2009-2023). Primary outcomes included bile duct clearance at index ERCP, post-procedural complications, stone recurrence, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,436 patients, median age 72 years (20-94), underwent 1853 ERCPs for BDS. The bile duct cannulation and clearance rates were 93.5% and 70.9%, respectively. The main reasons for procedure failure were incomplete stone removal (12.3%) and anatomical challenges (7.1%). Among the cohort, 22.8% required repeat ERCPs. The complication rate was 4.8% (pancreatitis = 1.7%, biliary sepsis = 1.5%, bleeding = 1.3% and perforation = 0.4%). The BDS recurrence rate was 9.8% and the median time to recurrence was 7 months (1-112). On multivariate analysis, male sex was the only risk factor for stone recurrence (OR:2.242,95%CI:1.304-3.853, P = 0.003). All patients with post-ERCP complications were admitted to the hospital, and their median hospital stay was seven days (1-306). The 90-day mortality rate was 2.1%.

CONCLUSION

In our study, index ERCP achieved stone clearance in 70.9% of cases, with a quarter of patients needing a repeat procedure. Patients should be appropriately consented to and informed of the success rate of ERCP and alternative treatment options, such as intraoperative imaging followed by bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy for surgically fit patients.

摘要

背景

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是胆管结石(BDS)的标准治疗方法。虽然报道的成功率通常超过80%,但文献中很少区分初次ERCP的成功率和多次手术的累积成功率。此外,ERCP成功的定义差异很大。

目的

本研究根据预先定义的标准评估初次ERCP的成功率。

方法

回顾性分析普利茅斯大学医院(2009 - 2023年)胆囊切除术前因BDS进行的所有ERCP。主要结局包括初次ERCP时胆管结石清除情况、术后并发症、结石复发和死亡率。

结果

共有1436例患者,中位年龄72岁(20 - 94岁),因BDS接受了1853次ERCP。胆管插管率和结石清除率分别为93.5%和70.9%。手术失败的主要原因是结石清除不完全(12.3%)和解剖结构复杂(7.1%)。在该队列中,22.8%的患者需要重复ERCP。并发症发生率为4.8%(胰腺炎 = 1.7%,胆源性败血症 = 1.5%,出血 = 1.3%,穿孔 = 0.4%)。BDS复发率为9.8%,复发的中位时间为7个月(1 - 112个月)。多因素分析显示,男性是结石复发的唯一危险因素(OR:2.242,95%CI:1.304 - 3.853,P = 0.003)。所有ERCP术后出现并发症的患者均入院治疗,中位住院时间为7天(1 - 306天)。90天死亡率为2.1%。

结论

在我们的研究中,初次ERCP在70.9%的病例中实现了结石清除,四分之一的患者需要重复手术。应适当告知患者ERCP的成功率以及替代治疗方案,如对于适合手术的患者,术中成像后进行胆管探查和胆囊切除术。

相似文献

1
Is the Success Rate of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ± Sphincterotomy Done for Bile Duct Stones Optimal?针对胆管结石进行的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)±括约肌切开术的成功率是否达到最佳?
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09333-z.
2
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub4.
3
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3.
4
Evaluating Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Outcomes in the Management of Common Bile Duct Stones With a Focus on Difficult Stones: A Retrospective Single-Center Study on Bile Duct Navigation From Kashmir, North India.评估内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)在胆总管结石治疗中的结果,重点关注困难结石:一项来自印度北部克什米尔地区的关于胆管导航的回顾性单中心研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 29;17(6):e86956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86956. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术与术中胆管造影术在胆总管结石诊断中的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 26;2015(2):CD010339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010339.pub2.
6
Laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct.腹腔镜 - 内镜会师术与术前内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆囊和胆管结石行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 11;4(4):CD010507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010507.pub2.
7
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub2.
8
NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy.美国国立卫生研究院关于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)用于诊断和治疗的科学现状声明。
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19(1):1-26.
9
Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is superior to biliary stent placement in preventing postendoscopic papillary balloon dilation pancreatitis.在内镜下乳头球囊扩张术后预防胰腺炎方面,内镜鼻胆管引流术优于胆管支架置入术。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 29;18:17562848251365025. doi: 10.1177/17562848251365025. eCollection 2025.
10
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration vs endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the treatment of difficult common bile duct stones: postsurgery inflammation and liver function.腹腔镜胆总管探查术与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗困难性胆总管结石的术后炎症及肝功能情况
J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Sep;29(9):102156. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102156. Epub 2025 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
PREDICTORS OF FAILURE OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN CLEARING BILE DUCT STONES DURING INDEX PROCEDURE - A PROSPECTIVE STUDY.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术清除胆管结石术中失败的预测因素——一项前瞻性研究。
Arq Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 4;61:e23112. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.24612023-112. eCollection 2024.
2
Global Epidemiology of Gallstones in the 21st Century: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.21 世纪全球胆石症流行病学:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Aug;22(8):1586-1595. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.01.051. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
3
Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
复发性胆总管结石的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jul-Dec;17(9):937-947. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
4
Observation versus intervention for incidental common bile duct stones at intraoperative cholangiogram: a systematic review.术中胆管造影时偶然发现的胆总管结石观察与干预:系统评价。
ANZ J Surg. 2023 Jul-Aug;93(7-8):1839-1846. doi: 10.1111/ans.18581. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
5
ERCP for bile duct stones across a national service, demonstrating a high requirement for repeat procedures.一项全国性服务中针对胆管结石的内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP),显示出对重复手术的高需求。
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Feb 2;11(2):E142-E148. doi: 10.1055/a-1951-4421. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography-related complications - Experience from tertiary care teaching centre over half a decade.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术相关并发症——来自三级医疗教学中心超过五年的经验
J Minim Access Surg. 2022 Oct-Dec;18(4):526-532. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_272_21.
7
A high-volume ERCP service led by surgeons is associated with good outcomes and meets national key performance indicators: results from a British district general hospital.由外科医生主导的大容量 ERCP 服务与良好的结果相关,并符合国家关键绩效指标:来自英国地区综合医院的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):6016-6023. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08978-x. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
8
Outcome of ERCP related to case-volume.ERCP 相关的结果与病例量有关。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5339-5347. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08915-y. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
9
Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline.内镜下胆总管结石的处理:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南。
Endoscopy. 2019 May;51(5):472-491. doi: 10.1055/a-0862-0346. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
10
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆总管探查术联合胆囊切除术与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊胆管结石:一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3275-3286. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06613-w. Epub 2018 Dec 3.