Lapinsuo M, Kilpikari J, Pätiälä H, Rokkanen P, Törmälä P, Lehtinen E
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (1978). 1986;105(4):193-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00435479.
In connection with osteosynthesis carried out on the tibias of rats we compared acrylic and bis-GMA plastics (CMW and Silar) and acrylic emulsion and acrylic dispersion used as intermediary material. A total of 80 rats of both sexes were used. The rats were divided into four groups, in which different intermediary material combinations were tested. The observation times were 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Macroscopical, radiological, histological, oxytetracycline fluorescence, and scanning electron-microscopical studies were done. Histologically, the Silar proved to be the more reliable fixation material and acrylic dispersion the better intermediary material. Furthermore, the radiological results were better (P less than 0.05) when acrylic dispersion was used as the intermediary material and Silar as the plastic.
在对大鼠胫骨进行骨接合术的过程中,我们比较了丙烯酸塑料和双甲基丙烯酸缩水甘油酯塑料(CMW和西拉尔),以及用作中间材料的丙烯酸乳液和丙烯酸分散体。总共使用了80只雌雄大鼠。将大鼠分为四组,测试不同的中间材料组合。观察时间为1、3、6、12和24周。进行了宏观、放射学、组织学、土霉素荧光和扫描电子显微镜研究。组织学上,西拉尔被证明是更可靠的固定材料,丙烯酸分散体是更好的中间材料。此外,当使用丙烯酸分散体作为中间材料且西拉尔作为塑料时,放射学结果更好(P小于0.05)。