Penner M J, Duncan C P, Masri B A
Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, Canada.
J Arthroplasty. 1999 Feb;14(2):209-14. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90128-6.
An in vitro study was carried out comparing the elution characteristics of Palacos-R and CMW acrylic cements. Three groups of 6 antibiotic-loaded cement disks were prepared, incorporating 1.0 g vancomycin and 2.4 g tobramycin per 40 g packet of cement. Palacos-R bone cement was used for group 1, CMW 1 for group 2, and CMW 3 for group 3. The disks were placed in saline baths for 9 weeks. The baths were periodically sampled and elution rates calculated. CMW 1 released 24% less tobramycin and 36% less vancomycin than Palacos-R over the total study period (P < .05). CMW 3 released 34% less tobramycin and 38% less vancomycin than Palacos-R (P < .05). There was no significant difference in antibiotic release between CMW 1 and CMW 3. The in vitro elution characteristics of Palacos-R are superior to CMW.
进行了一项体外研究,比较了Palacos-R和CMW骨水泥的洗脱特性。制备了三组,每组6个载抗生素骨水泥盘,每40克骨水泥包中加入1.0克万古霉素和2.4克妥布霉素。第1组使用Palacos-R骨水泥,第2组使用CMW 1,第3组使用CMW 3。将这些盘片置于盐水中9周。定期对盐水进行采样并计算洗脱率。在整个研究期间,CMW 1释放的妥布霉素比Palacos-R少24%,万古霉素少36%(P < 0.05)。CMW 3释放的妥布霉素比Palacos-R少34%,万古霉素少38%(P < 0.05)。CMW 1和CMW 3之间的抗生素释放没有显著差异。Palacos-R的体外洗脱特性优于CMW。