Herber Agustin P, Brinkman Joseph C, Tummala Sailesh V, Economopoulos Kostas J
University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2024 Mar;40(3):869-875. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.029. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
To determine clinical and radiographic outcomes of medial collateral ligament (MCL) pie-crusting during isolated medial meniscal root repair.
A retrospective review was conducted between August 2013 and December 2019 in patients undergoing isolated medial meniscal root repair. Outcomes, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, re-tears, MCL laxity, and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), were compared between pie crust (PC) and non-pie crust (NPC) cohorts. Other assessments included subjective instability or stiffness, infection, and intra-operative chondromalacia. Additionally, radiographic outcomes were compared to determine progression of medial compartment arthrosis.
Final analysis included 97 knees, 45 in the PC, and 52 in the NPC group. IKDC and Lysholm scores were similar between both groups preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. However, at the 6,12, and 24-month follow up, the PC group had a significantly higher measured IKDC and Lysholm scores than the NPC group. PASS percentages for the IKDC score were significantly higher in the PC group at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (96.2%; P = .02) follow-up compared to the NPC group. MCID percentages for the IKDC score were also significantly higher at the 1- and 2-year (100%; P = .05) follow-up in the PC group compared to the NPC group. There was also a significantly higher rate of recurrent medial meniscal root tears in the NPC group (4 [8.9%]) compared to the PC group (0 [P = .03]). No MCL laxity was observed at 6 months follow-up.
MCL pie-crusting during isolated medial meniscal root repair can be used as an alternative surgical technique, as it leads to improved clinical and patient outcomes compared to patients who do not undergo MCL pie-crusting in the short term. Additionally, those that underwent MCL pie-crusting had a lower incidence of recurrent tears, and no patients experienced MCL laxity at 6 months.
Level III, retrospective cohort/comparative study.
确定在单纯内侧半月板根部修复术中进行内侧副韧带(MCL)“饼状切开”的临床和影像学结果。
对2013年8月至2019年12月期间接受单纯内侧半月板根部修复术的患者进行回顾性研究。比较“饼状切开”(PC)组和非“饼状切开”(NPC)组的结果,包括国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Lysholm评分、再撕裂情况、MCL松弛度以及转为全膝关节置换术(TKA)的情况。其他评估包括主观不稳定或僵硬、感染以及术中软骨软化情况。此外,比较影像学结果以确定内侧间室关节炎的进展情况。
最终分析纳入97例膝关节,PC组45例,NPC组52例。两组术前及术后3个月时IKDC和Lysholm评分相似。然而,在6个月、12个月和24个月随访时,PC组的IKDC和Lysholm评分显著高于NPC组。与NPC组相比,PC组在6个月、1年和2年随访时IKDC评分的PASS百分比显著更高(96.2%;P = 0.02)。与NPC组相比,PC组在1年和2年随访时IKDC评分的最小临床重要差异(MCID)百分比也显著更高(100%;P = 0.05)。与PC组(0例[P = 0.03])相比,NPC组内侧半月板根部再撕裂发生率也显著更高(4例[8.9%])。6个月随访时未观察到MCL松弛。
在单纯内侧半月板根部修复术中进行MCL“饼状切开”可作为一种替代手术技术,因为与短期内未进行MCL“饼状切开”的患者相比,它能改善临床和患者结局。此外,接受MCL“饼状切开”的患者再撕裂发生率较低,且6个月时无患者出现MCL松弛。
III级,回顾性队列/比较研究。