Suppr超能文献

在关节镜下修复内侧半月板撕裂时:不要害怕采用“饼皮”技术。

During Arthroscopic Repair of Medial Meniscal Tears: Do Not Be Afraid to Perform "Pie Crust" Technique.

作者信息

Arıcan Gökhun, Ercan Niyazi, Atmaca Emre, İltar Serkan, Alemdaroğlu Kadir B

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Health Sciences Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2023 Jan;36(2):139-145. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731352. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

Abstract

In the absence of effective long-term repair of meniscal injuries, damage to the knee may lead to the development of osteoarthritis. Recent reports have recommended meniscal repair to be undertaken in all cases of meniscal tears. However, the most common complication encountered during repair of the medial meniscus is iatrogenic cartilage and meniscal injury due to its unclear visualization. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological results of the pie-crust (PC) technique performed during the repair of medial meniscal tears. This retrospective study included 86 patients who underwent arthroscopic medial meniscus repair. PC technique was performed if the medial joint width was less than 5 mm. The patient population was divided into two groups as who underwent meniscus repair with PC technique (PC + repair group) or not (repair group). All patients were evaluated clinically (Kujala score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity score) and radiologically (medial joint width and valgus laxity angle). When the medial joint width measurements before the PC technique and at the postoperative first and sixth months were compared, it was found to be statistically significant ( < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the preoperative and 12-month postoperative joint width measurements ( > 0.05). At the 12-month follow-up, no statistically significant difference was determined for the valgus laxity angle in the PC group compared with preoperative values ( > 0.05). The follow-up Kujala score, IKDC subjective score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity score were similar between the groups. The clinical scores in both groups were determined to have statistically significant increase at 12-month postoperatively compared with the preoperative values ( < 0.05). The results of this study showed that performing the PC technique prior to medial meniscal tear repair increase the medial joint visualization safely and effectively without permanent valgus laxity.

摘要

在半月板损伤缺乏有效的长期修复的情况下,膝关节损伤可能会导致骨关节炎的发展。最近的报告建议对所有半月板撕裂病例进行半月板修复。然而,内侧半月板修复过程中最常见的并发症是医源性软骨和半月板损伤,因为其可视化不清晰。本研究的目的是评估在修复内侧半月板撕裂时采用的“饼皮”(PC)技术的长期临床和放射学结果。这项回顾性研究纳入了86例行关节镜下内侧半月板修复的患者。如果内侧关节间隙小于5毫米,则采用PC技术。患者人群被分为两组,一组采用PC技术进行半月板修复(PC + 修复组),另一组未采用(修复组)。所有患者均接受临床评估(库贾拉评分、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观评分、莱肖尔姆评分和特格纳活动评分)和放射学评估(内侧关节间隙和外翻松弛角)。比较PC技术术前、术后第一个月和第六个月的内侧关节间隙测量值,发现具有统计学意义(<0.05)。然而,术前和术后12个月的关节间隙测量值之间没有显著差异(>0.05)。在12个月的随访中,PC组的外翻松弛角与术前值相比没有统计学显著差异(>0.05)。两组之间的随访库贾拉评分、IKDC主观评分、莱肖尔姆评分和特格纳活动评分相似。两组的临床评分在术后12个月时与术前值相比均有统计学显著提高(<0.05)。本研究结果表明,在内侧半月板撕裂修复之前采用PC技术可安全有效地增加内侧关节的可视化,且不会导致永久性外翻松弛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验