Faculté de Médecine et Pharmacie, Département de Santé Publique, Université de Kisangani, Kisangani, Congo (the Democratic Republic of the)
Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 2;13(8):e071344. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071344.
We aimed to understand how capacity building programmes (CBPs) of district health managers (DHMs) have been designed, delivered and evaluated in sub-Saharan Africa. We focused on identifying the underlying assumptions behind leadership and management CBPs at the district level.
Scoping review.
We searched five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Health Systems Evidence, Wiley Online Library, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar) on 6 April 2021 and 13 October 2022. We also searched for grey literature and used citation tracking.
We included all primary studies (1) reporting leadership or management capacity building of DHMs, (2) in sub-Saharan Africa, (3) written in English or French and (4) published between 1 January 1987 and 13 October 2022.
Three independent reviewers extracted data from included articles. We used the best fit framework synthesis approach to identify an a priori framework that guided data coding, analysis and synthesis. We also conducted an inductive analysis of data that could not be coded against the a priori framework.
We identified 2523 papers and ultimately included 44 papers after screening and assessment for eligibility. Key findings included (1) a scarcity of explicit theories underlying CBPs, (2) a diversity of learning approaches with increasing use of the action learning approach, (3) a diversity of content with a focus on management rather than leadership functions and (4) a diversity of evaluation methods with limited use of theory-driven designs to evaluate leadership and management capacity building interventions.
This review highlights the need for explicit and well-articulated programme theories for leadership and management development interventions and the need for strengthening their evaluation using theory-driven designs that fit the complexity of health systems.
我们旨在了解撒哈拉以南非洲地区的地区卫生管理人员(DHM)能力建设计划(CBP)是如何设计、实施和评估的。我们专注于确定在地区层面上领导和管理 CBP 的潜在假设。
范围综述。
我们于 2021 年 4 月 6 日和 2022 年 10 月 13 日在五个电子数据库(MEDLINE、Health Systems Evidence、Wiley Online Library、Cochrane Library 和 Google Scholar)中进行了搜索。我们还搜索了灰色文献并使用了引文追踪。
我们纳入了所有(1)报告 DHM 领导力或管理能力建设的原始研究,(2)在撒哈拉以南非洲,(3)用英语或法语撰写,(4)发表于 1987 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 10 月 13 日之间的研究。
三名独立评审员从纳入的文章中提取资料。我们使用最佳契合框架综合方法确定了一个预先确定的框架,该框架指导了数据编码、分析和综合。我们还对无法按照预先确定的框架进行编码的数据进行了归纳分析。
我们确定了 2523 篇论文,经过筛选和资格评估,最终纳入了 44 篇论文。主要发现包括(1)CBP 背后缺乏明确的理论,(2)学习方法多样化,越来越多地采用行动学习方法,(3)内容多样化,重点是管理而不是领导职能,(4)评估方法多样化,很少使用理论驱动的设计来评估领导力和管理能力建设干预措施。
本综述强调了明确和精心制定的领导力和管理发展干预计划方案理论的必要性,以及使用适合卫生系统复杂性的理论驱动设计来加强其评估的必要性。