VA Los Angeles HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(13):2870-2878. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08172-w. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Optimizing patients' access to primary care is critically important but challenging. In a national survey, we asked primary care providers and staff to rate specific care processes as access management challenges and assessed whether clinics with more of these challenges had worse access outcomes.
Study design: Cross sectional. National Primary Care Personnel Survey (NPCPS) (2018) participants included 6210 primary care providers (PCPs) and staff in 813 clinics (19% response rate) and 158,645 of their patients. We linked PCP and staff ratings of access management challenges to veterans' perceived access from 2018-2019 Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients-Patient Centered Medical Home (SHEP-PCMH) surveys (35.6% response rate).
The NPCPS queried PCPs and staff about access management challenges. The mean overall access challenge score was 28.6, SD 6.0. The SHEP-PCMH access composite asked how often veterans reported always obtaining urgent appointments same/next day; routine appointments when desired and having medical questions answered during office hours.
We aggregated PCP and staff responses to clinic level, and use multi-level, multivariate logistic regressions to assess associations between clinic-level access management challenges and patient perceptions of access. We controlled for veteran-, facility-, and area-level characteristics.
Veterans at clinics with more access management challenges (> 75 percentile) had a lower likelihood of reporting always receiving timely urgent care appointments (AOR: .86, 95% CI: .78-.95); always receiving routine appointments (AOR: .74, 95% CI: .67-.82); and always reporting same- or next-day answers to telephone questions (AOR: .79, 95% CI: .70-.90) compared to veterans receiving care at clinics with fewer (< 25 percentile) challenges.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Findings show a strong relationship between higher levels of access management challenges and worse patient perceptions of access. Addressing access management challenges, particularly those associated with call center communication, may be an actionable path for improved patient experience.
背景/目的:优化患者获得初级保健的机会至关重要,但具有挑战性。在一项全国性调查中,我们要求初级保健提供者和工作人员对特定的医疗服务流程进行评估,将其视为获取管理方面的挑战,并评估这些挑战较多的诊所的获取结果是否较差。
研究设计:横断面研究。全国初级保健人员调查(NPCPS)(2018 年)的参与者包括 813 个诊所的 6210 名初级保健提供者(PCP)和工作人员(19%的回应率)及其 158645 名患者。我们将 PCP 和工作人员对获取管理挑战的评估与 2018-2019 年患者中心医疗之家医疗体验调查(SHEP-PCMH)调查中退伍军人对获取情况的感知(35.6%的回应率)联系起来。
NPCPS 询问 PCP 和工作人员有关获取管理挑战的问题。总体获取挑战评分的平均值为 28.6,标准差为 6.0。SHEP-PCMH 获取综合指标询问退伍军人报告他们是否经常在同一天或次日获得紧急预约;在他们期望的时间获得常规预约;以及在办公时间内得到医疗问题的答复。
我们将 PCP 和工作人员的回答汇总到诊所层面,并使用多层次、多变量逻辑回归来评估诊所层面的获取管理挑战与患者对获取情况的感知之间的关联。我们控制了退伍军人、设施和地区层面的特征。
在获取管理挑战较多(>75 百分位)的诊所就诊的退伍军人,报告总是能及时获得紧急护理预约的可能性较低(AOR:0.86,95%CI:0.78-0.95);总是能获得常规预约(AOR:0.74,95%CI:0.67-0.82);以及总是报告在同一天或次日答复电话问题(AOR:0.79,95%CI:0.70-0.90),与在获取挑战较少(<25 百分位)的诊所就诊的退伍军人相比。
讨论/结论:研究结果表明,较高水平的获取管理挑战与较差的患者获取感知之间存在很强的关系。解决获取管理挑战,特别是与呼叫中心沟通相关的挑战,可能是改善患者体验的可行途径。