Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Room D3-335, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Public Health, Aging and Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Aug 2;22(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01218-0.
To improve transmural palliative care for older adults acutely admitted to hospital, the PalliSupport intervention, comprising an educational programme and transmural palliative care pathway, was developed. This care pathway involves timely identification of palliative care needs, advance care planning, multidisciplinary team meetings, warm handover, and follow-up home visits. With this study, we evaluate changes in patient-related outcomes and transmural collaboration after implementation of the care pathway.
We conducted a before-after study, in which we compared 1) unplanned hospital admission and death at place of preference and 2) transmural collaboration before implementation, up to six months, and six to 18 months after implementation. Data from palliative care team consultations were collected between February 2017 and February 2020 in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands.
The palliative care team held 711 first-time consultations. The number of consultation, as well as the number of consultations for patients with non-malignant diseases, and consultations for advance care planning increased after implementation. The implementation of the pathway had no statistically significant effect on unplanned hospitalization but associated positively with death at place of preference more than six months after implementation (during/shortly after adjusted OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 0.84-5.35; p-value: 0.11, long term after adjusted OR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.49-6.62; p-value: 0.003). Effects on transmural collaboration showed that there were more warm handovers during/shortly after implementation, but not on long term. Primary care professionals attended multidisciplinary team meetings more often during and shortly after implementation, but did not more than six months after implementation.
The pathway did not affect unplanned hospital admissions, but more patients died at their place of preference after implementation. Implementation of the pathway increased attention to- and awareness for in-hospital palliative care, but did not improve transmural collaboration on long-term. For some patients, the hospital admissions might helped in facilitating death at place of preference.
为了改善因急性病入院的老年患者的全人舒缓照护,开发了 PalliSupport 干预措施,包括教育计划和全人舒缓照护途径,该途径涉及及时识别舒缓照护需求、预先护理计划、多学科团队会议、温馨交接和家庭随访。通过这项研究,我们评估了实施该途径后患者相关结局和跨学科协作的变化。
我们进行了一项前后对照研究,比较了 1)无计划的住院和在偏好地点死亡,以及 2)实施前 6 个月、实施后 6 至 18 个月的跨学科协作。2017 年 2 月至 2020 年 2 月,在荷兰的一家教学医院收集了舒缓护理团队咨询的数据。
舒缓护理团队进行了 711 次首次咨询。实施后,咨询次数以及非恶性疾病患者的咨询次数和预先护理计划咨询次数均有所增加。该途径的实施对无计划住院没有统计学显著影响,但与实施后 6 个月以上在偏好地点死亡呈正相关(期间/短期内调整后的 OR:2.12;95%CI:0.84-5.35;p 值:0.11,长期调整后的 OR:3.14;95%CI:1.49-6.62;p 值:0.003)。跨学科协作的效果表明,实施期间/短期内的交接更多,但长期并无增加。初级保健专业人员在实施期间和短期内更多地参加多学科团队会议,但实施 6 个月后并非如此。
该途径并未影响无计划的住院治疗,但实施后更多的患者在偏好地点死亡。实施该途径增加了对住院舒缓护理的关注和认识,但在长期内并未改善跨学科协作。对于一些患者,住院可能有助于在偏好地点实现死亡。