Department of General Practice, Section of Medical Ethics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Univeristy of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jul 9;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0439-0.
Early start of palliative care improves the quality of life of eligible patients and their relatives. However, in hospital, patients who could benefit from palliative care are often not identified timely. The aim of this study is to assess how hospital-based nurses and physicians define the palliative phase, how they identify the palliative phase and what difficulties they face.
Semi-structured interviews were held with ten nurses and 18 physicians working at seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Data was analysed using thematic analysis.
Nurses and physicians feel insecure about how to define the palliative phase and differentiate between an acute and extended phase. Great variation existed in what life expectancy is attributed to each phase. A variety of ways to identify the palliative phase were described: 1) Prognostication. 2) Treatment trade-off. 3) Assessment of patients' preferences and needs. 4) Interprofessional collaboration. Professionals base prognostication on their experience but also search for clinical indicators. When benefits of treatment no longer outweigh the negatives, this was considered an, albeit late, identification point. To start a conversation on a patients' palliative care needs was found to be difficult. Therefore, some respondents wait for patients to vocalize preferences themselves. Many professionals rely on interprofessional collaboration for identification, however uncertainty exist about responsibilities. Difficulties in identification occurred because of variance in definitions, unpredictability of non-oncological diseases, focus on treatment and difficulties in communication and collaboration.
These results provide insight into the challenges and difficulties hospital-based professionals experience in timely identification of patients with palliative care needs.
早期开始姑息治疗可以提高符合条件的患者及其家属的生活质量。然而,在医院中,那些可以从姑息治疗中受益的患者往往不能及时得到识别。本研究旨在评估医院护士和医生如何定义姑息治疗阶段,如何识别姑息治疗阶段以及他们面临的困难。
对荷兰 7 家医院的 10 名护士和 18 名医生进行了半结构化访谈。使用主题分析对数据进行分析。
护士和医生对如何定义姑息治疗阶段以及区分急性和扩展阶段感到不确定。对每个阶段的预期寿命存在很大差异。描述了识别姑息治疗阶段的各种方法:1)预后。2)治疗权衡。3)评估患者的偏好和需求。4)跨专业协作。专业人员根据经验进行预后,但也寻找临床指标。当治疗的益处不再超过负面影响时,这被认为是一个(尽管是晚期)识别点。发现开始讨论患者的姑息治疗需求很困难。因此,一些受访者等待患者自己表达偏好。许多专业人员依靠跨专业协作进行识别,但对责任存在不确定性。识别困难是由于定义的差异、非肿瘤性疾病的不可预测性、对治疗的关注以及沟通和协作方面的困难造成的。
这些结果提供了对医院专业人员在及时识别有姑息治疗需求的患者方面所面临的挑战和困难的深入了解。