Johnson Emma E, Campbell Michael P, Reddy Manoj, Paul Ryan W, Erickson Brandon J, Tjoumakaris Fotios P, Freedman Kevin B, Bishop Meghan E
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jul 31;11(7):23259671231186823. doi: 10.1177/23259671231186823. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Patella alta is a risk factor for recurrent patellar instability. Differences in chondral injury in patients with patellar instability between patella alta and patella norma have not been evaluated.
To analyze whether preoperative cartilage damage differs in severity and location between patellar instability patients with and without patella alta.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Patients with patellar instability who underwent patellar realignment surgery at a single institution with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were included. After measurement of Caton-Deschamps index (CDI) on MRI, patients were divided into patella alta (CDI ≥1.3) and patella norma groups. The area measurement and depth and underlying structures (AMADEUS) score was used to quantify cartilage defect severity on MRI.
A total of 121 patients were divided into patella alta (n = 50) and patella norma (n = 71) groups. The groups did not differ significantly in sex ratio, age at MRI, body mass index, mean reported number of previous dislocations, or mean interval between first reported dislocation and date of MRI. A total of 34 (68%) of the patella alta group and 44 (62%) of the patella norma group had chondral defects ( = .625) with no significant between-group differences in defect size ( = .419). In both groups, chondral injuries most affected the medial patellar facet (55% in patella alta vs 52% in patella norma), followed by the lateral facet (25% vs 18%), and lateral femoral condyle (10% vs 14%). A smaller proportion of patients had full-thickness defects in the patella alta compared with the patella norma group (60% vs 82%; = .030). The overall AMADEUS score was higher for the patella alta versus the patella norma group (68.9 vs 62.1; = .023), indicating superior articular cartilage status.
Patients with patella alta had less severe cartilage injury after patellar instability, including a lower proportion with full-thickness defects and better overall cartilage grade. The location of injury when present was similar between alta and norma, with most defects affecting the medial facet, lateral facet, and lateral femoral condyle in descending frequency.
高位髌骨是复发性髌骨不稳定的一个危险因素。高位髌骨和正常髌骨的髌骨不稳定患者软骨损伤的差异尚未得到评估。
分析有无高位髌骨的髌骨不稳定患者术前软骨损伤在严重程度和位置上是否存在差异。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
纳入在单一机构接受髌骨重新排列手术且术前行磁共振成像(MRI)扫描的髌骨不稳定患者。在MRI上测量Caton-Deschamps指数(CDI)后,将患者分为高位髌骨组(CDI≥1.3)和正常髌骨组。使用面积测量及深度和底层结构(AMADEUS)评分来量化MRI上软骨缺损的严重程度。
共121例患者被分为高位髌骨组(n = 50)和正常髌骨组(n = 71)。两组在性别比例、MRI检查时的年龄、体重指数、既往脱位的平均报告次数或首次报告脱位至MRI检查日期的平均间隔方面无显著差异。高位髌骨组共有34例(68%)、正常髌骨组共有44例(62%)存在软骨缺损(P = 0.625),两组间缺损大小无显著差异(P = 0.419)。在两组中,软骨损伤最常累及髌骨内侧关节面(高位髌骨组为55%,正常髌骨组为52%),其次是外侧关节面(分别为25%和18%)以及股骨外侧髁(分别为10%和14%)。与正常髌骨组相比,高位髌骨组全层缺损患者的比例较小(60%对82%;P = 0.030)。高位髌骨组的总体AMADEUS评分高于正常髌骨组(68.9对62.1;P = 0.023),表明关节软骨状态更好。
高位髌骨的患者在髌骨不稳定后软骨损伤较轻,包括全层缺损比例较低以及总体软骨分级较好。高位髌骨组和正常髌骨组损伤部位相似,大多数缺损按频率递减依次累及内侧关节面、外侧关节面和股骨外侧髁。