Suppr超能文献

[三相中空纤维液相微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定[具体物质1]和[具体物质2]中的三种植物生长调节剂] (你提供的原文中存在部分信息缺失,我根据格式推测补充了[具体物质1]和[具体物质2],你可根据实际情况进行调整)

[Determination of three plant growth regulators in and by three-phase hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction- high performance liquid chromatography].

作者信息

Wu Ping-Ping, Lin Ren-Yi, Huang Li-Ying

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350122, China.

出版信息

Se Pu. 2023 Aug;41(8):683-689. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2023.03007.

Abstract

() and () are precious raw materials for traditional Chinese medicine. The growing demand for and cannot be met by current production techniques. Hence, the widespread artificial cultivation of and using substantial amounts of plant growth regulators (PGRs) has emerged. The excessive use of PGRs not only affects the quality and efficacy of medicinal materials but also causes a series of safety issues. Therefore, expanding research on residual PGRs in valuable Chinese medicinal materials is important to avoid the health hazards caused by these substances. Unfortunately, the identification of PGRs is challenging because of their trace and complex matrices. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has become one of the mainstream analytical methods for PGR determination. An important consideration in the application of this technique to the detection of trace acidic PGRs is how to improve its accuracy and sensitivity. Three-phase hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction (3P-HF-LPME) has the advantages of a high enrichment factor, complex sample purification ability, low reagent consumption, low cost, and easy integration with chromatographic systems. Thus, the 3P-HF-LPME method overcomes the many shortcomings of traditional sample pretreatment methods. In this study, a novel, simple, and effective analytical method based on 3P-HF-LPME combined with HPLC was developed to extract, purify, enrich, and detect three trace acidic PGRs (indole-3-acetic acid, naphthyl acetic acid and indolebutyric acid) in and . The chromatographic separation conditions and 3P-HF-LPME model parameters were systematically optimized for this purpose. First, the sample solution was prepared by ultrasonication and low-temperature standing, and then adjusted to pH 3.0 using dilute hydrochloric acid. The sample solution (10 mL) and NaCl (1.50 g) were stored in a 15 mL brown extraction bottle with a built-in magnetic stirrer. Next, 30 μL of NaOH solution (pH 11.0) as the inner phase solution was injected into the inner cavity of a hollow fiber tube, which was subsequently sealed at both ends. The hollow fiber tube was soaked in -octanol for 5 min and dried naturally to remove excess extraction solvent from its surface. Finally, the fiber tube was placed in a brown extraction bottle and stirred using a thermostatic magnetic stirrer at 40 ℃ and 1600 r/min for 2 h. After extraction, the three target analytes were separated on a Welch Ultimate XB-C column (250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm) under isocratic elution conditions using acetic acid aqueous solution and methanol (45∶55, v/v) as the eluent. The results indicated that the three PGRs showed good linearity in the range of 0.5-100.0 μg/L (coefficients of determination ()=0.9999), with limits of detection (LODs) of 0.02-0.15 μg/L. The method recoveries were 88.5-102.2%, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of less than 3.7% (=3). The extraction efficiencies and enrichment factors of the three PGRs in 15 batches of fresh and products were found to be 42.0%-86.8% and 140-289. Full-scan mass spectrometry was used to further identify positive samples to avoid false-positive results and enhance the reliability of the experimental method. In summary, the proposed method is sensitive, accurate, reliable, environment friendly, and capable of high enrichment. It could be used to determine the residues of three acidic PGRs in and . Moreover, it can provide technical support for the residue detection of PGRs in other Chinese medicinal materials.

摘要

()和()是中药材的珍贵原料。目前的生产技术无法满足对()和()日益增长的需求。因此,出现了大量使用植物生长调节剂(PGRs)进行()和()的广泛人工栽培。PGRs的过度使用不仅影响药材的质量和功效,还会引发一系列安全问题。因此,开展对珍贵中药材中PGRs残留的研究,对于避免这些物质造成的健康危害具有重要意义。不幸的是,由于PGRs痕量且基质复杂,其鉴定具有挑战性。高效液相色谱法(HPLC)已成为PGR测定的主流分析方法之一。将该技术应用于痕量酸性PGR检测时,一个重要的考虑因素是如何提高其准确性和灵敏度。三相中空纤维液相微萃取(3P-HF-LPME)具有富集倍数高、能净化复杂样品、试剂消耗低、成本低以及易于与色谱系统联用等优点。因此,3P-HF-LPME方法克服了传统样品预处理方法的诸多缺点。本研究建立了一种基于3P-HF-LPME结合HPLC的新颖、简便且有效的分析方法,用于提取、净化、富集和检测()和()中的三种痕量酸性PGRs(吲哚-3-乙酸、萘乙酸和吲哚丁酸)。为此,系统优化了色谱分离条件和3P-HF-LPME模型参数。首先,通过超声和低温静置制备样品溶液,然后用稀盐酸将其pH值调至3.0。将样品溶液(10 mL)和氯化钠(1.50 g)置于带有内置磁力搅拌器的15 mL棕色萃取瓶中。接下来,将30 μL pH值为11.0的氢氧化钠溶液作为内相溶液注入中空纤维管的内腔,随后将两端密封。将中空纤维管在正辛醇中浸泡5 min,自然干燥以去除其表面多余的萃取溶剂。最后,将纤维管置于棕色萃取瓶中,在40℃、1600 r/min条件下用恒温磁力搅拌器搅拌2 h。萃取后,在Welch Ultimate XB-C柱(250 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm)上,以乙酸水溶液和甲醇(45∶55,v/v)作为洗脱剂,在等度洗脱条件下分离三种目标分析物。结果表明,三种PGRs在0.5 - 100.0 μg/L范围内呈现良好的线性关系(测定系数()=0.9999),检测限(LODs)为0.02 - 0.15 μg/L。方法回收率为88.5% - 102.2%,相对标准偏差(RSDs)小于3.7%(=3)。在15批次新鲜()和()产品中,三种PGRs的萃取效率和富集倍数分别为42.0% - 86.8%和140 - 289。采用全扫描质谱进一步鉴定阳性样品,以避免假阳性结果,提高实验方法的可靠性。综上所述,所提出的方法灵敏、准确、可靠、环境友好且富集能力强。它可用于测定()和()中三种酸性PGRs的残留量。此外,它可为其他中药材中PGRs残留检测提供技术支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a5f/10398823/e8232c0b38aa/cjc-41-08-683-img_1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验