Suppr超能文献

临床病理不一致——并非意外发生的情况。

Clinicopathologic discordance-a not unexpected occurrence.

作者信息

Byard Roger W

机构信息

School of Biomedicine, Helen Mayo North, The University of Adelaide, Level 2, Room N237 Frome Road, SA, 5000, Adelaide 5005, Australia.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Dec;20(4):1536-1537. doi: 10.1007/s12024-023-00684-5. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

Abstract

Disagreements between clinical and forensic interpretations of post-mortem findings are sometimes influenced by prior experiences with particular patient cohorts. While patients who present clinically have characteristic indicators of disease (thus enabling diagnosis), symptoms and signs may not have been manifested by those who die suddenly and unexpectedly and present for medicolegal assessment. Thus, the determination of likely or possible lethal mechanisms requires an understanding of occult disease processes and idiosyncratic responses that may be very different from case to case. Summaries of cases should be undertaken with an awareness of the limitations of individual knowledge and may be augmented by collaboration and pooling of expertise.

摘要

临床和法医对尸检结果的解读之间的分歧有时会受到对特定患者群体既往经验的影响。临床上出现症状的患者有疾病的特征性指标(从而能够进行诊断),而突然意外死亡并接受法医学评估的患者可能并未表现出症状和体征。因此,确定可能的致死机制需要了解隐匿的疾病过程和因人而异的反应,这些在不同病例中可能差异很大。在总结病例时应意识到个人知识的局限性,并可通过合作和专业知识的汇集加以补充。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验