Suppr超能文献

临床病理不一致——并非意外发生的情况。

Clinicopathologic discordance-a not unexpected occurrence.

作者信息

Byard Roger W

机构信息

School of Biomedicine, Helen Mayo North, The University of Adelaide, Level 2, Room N237 Frome Road, SA, 5000, Adelaide 5005, Australia.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Dec;20(4):1536-1537. doi: 10.1007/s12024-023-00684-5. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

Abstract

Disagreements between clinical and forensic interpretations of post-mortem findings are sometimes influenced by prior experiences with particular patient cohorts. While patients who present clinically have characteristic indicators of disease (thus enabling diagnosis), symptoms and signs may not have been manifested by those who die suddenly and unexpectedly and present for medicolegal assessment. Thus, the determination of likely or possible lethal mechanisms requires an understanding of occult disease processes and idiosyncratic responses that may be very different from case to case. Summaries of cases should be undertaken with an awareness of the limitations of individual knowledge and may be augmented by collaboration and pooling of expertise.

摘要

临床和法医对尸检结果的解读之间的分歧有时会受到对特定患者群体既往经验的影响。临床上出现症状的患者有疾病的特征性指标(从而能够进行诊断),而突然意外死亡并接受法医学评估的患者可能并未表现出症状和体征。因此,确定可能的致死机制需要了解隐匿的疾病过程和因人而异的反应,这些在不同病例中可能差异很大。在总结病例时应意识到个人知识的局限性,并可通过合作和专业知识的汇集加以补充。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验