Suppr超能文献

使用伯格平衡量表或简易平衡评估系统测试对中风患者多平面步行独立性的临床预测规则。

Clinical prediction rules for multi surfaces walking independence using the Berg Balance Scale or Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in persons with stroke.

作者信息

Tamura Shuntaro, Kobayashi Sota, Takeda Ren, Kaizu Yoichi, Iwamura Taiki, Saito Shota, Iwamoto Hiroki, Miyata Kazuhiro

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Fujioka General Hospital, Fujioka, Japan.

Department of Rehabilitation, Public Nanokaichi Hospital, Tomioka, Japan.

出版信息

Top Stroke Rehabil. 2024 Mar;31(2):135-144. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2238437. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A Clinical prediction rule (CPR) for determining multi surfaces walking independence in persons with stroke has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a CPR for determining multi surfaces walking independence in persons with stroke.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of 419 persons with stroke. We developed a Berg Balance Scale (BBS)-model CPR combining the BBS, comfortable walking speed (CWS) and cognitive impairment, and a Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)-model CPR combining the Mini-BESTest, CWS, and cognitive impairment. A logistic regression analysis was conducted with multi surfaces walking independence as the dependent variable and each factor as an independent variable. The identified factors were scored (0, 1) based on reported cutoff values. The CPR's accuracy was verified by the area under the curve (AUC). We used a bootstrap method internal validation and calculated the CPR's posttest probability.

RESULTS

The logistic regression analysis showed that the BBS, CWS, and cognitive impairment were factors in the BBS model, and the Mini-BESTest was a factor in the Mini-BESTest model. The CPRs were 0-3 points for the BBS model and 0-1 points for the Mini-BESTest model. The AUCs (bootstrap mean AUC) of the CPR score were 0.89 (0.90) for the BBS model and 0.72 (0.72) for the Mini-BESTest model. The negative predictive value (negative likelihood ratio) was 97% (0.054) for CPR scores < 2 for the BBS model and 94% (0.060) for CPR scores < 1 for the Mini-BESTest model.

CONCLUSIONS

The CPR developed herein is useful for determining multi surfaces walking independence.

摘要

背景

尚未建立用于确定中风患者多表面行走独立性的临床预测规则(CPR)。

目的

开发一种用于确定中风患者多表面行走独立性的CPR。

方法

这是一项对419名中风患者的多中心回顾性分析。我们开发了一种结合伯格平衡量表(BBS)、舒适步行速度(CWS)和认知障碍的BBS模型CPR,以及一种结合简易平衡评估系统测试(Mini-BESTest)、CWS和认知障碍的Mini-BESTest模型CPR。以多表面行走独立性为因变量,各因素为自变量进行逻辑回归分析。根据报告的临界值对识别出的因素进行评分(0、1)。通过曲线下面积(AUC)验证CPR的准确性。我们使用自举法进行内部验证并计算CPR的检验后概率。

结果

逻辑回归分析表明,BBS、CWS和认知障碍是BBS模型中的因素,Mini-BESTest是Mini-BESTest模型中的因素。BBS模型的CPR为0至3分,Mini-BESTest模型的CPR为0至1分。CPR评分的AUC(自举法平均AUC),BBS模型为0.89(0.90),Mini-BESTest模型为0.72(0.72)。BBS模型CPR评分<2时的阴性预测值(阴性似然比)为97%(0.054),Mini-BESTest模型CPR评分<1时的阴性预测值为94%(0.060)。

结论

本文开发的CPR可用于确定多表面行走独立性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验