• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性硬化症与语义记忆结构的差异有关。

Multiple sclerosis is associated with differences in semantic memory structure.

机构信息

Laboratory for Cognition and Neural Stimulation, University of Pennsylvania.

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.

出版信息

Neuropsychology. 2024 Jan;38(1):42-57. doi: 10.1037/neu0000924. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1037/neu0000924
PMID:37535532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10837332/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although language is often considered to be largely intact in multiple sclerosis (MS), word-finding difficulties are a common complaint. Recent work suggests that declines in language are not solely the result of motoric and cognitive slowing that is most strongly associated with MS. Network science approaches have been effectively used to examine network structure as it relates to clinical conditions, aging, and language. The present study utilizes a network science approach to investigate whether individuals with MS exhibit less interconnected and resilient semantic networks compared to age-matched neurotypical peers.

METHOD

We used semantic fluency data from 89 participants with MS and 88 neurotypical participants to estimate and analyze the semantic network structure for each participant group. Additionally, we conducted a percolation analysis to examine the resilience of each network.

RESULTS

Network measures showed that individuals with MS had lower local and global clustering coefficients, longer average shortest path lengths, and higher modularity values compared to neurotypical peers. Small-worldness, network portrait divergence measures, and community detection analyses were consistent with these results and indicated that macroscopic properties of the two networks differed and that the semantic network for individuals with MS was more fractured than the neurotypical peer network. Moreover, a spreading activation simulation and percolation analysis suggested that the semantic networks of individuals with MS are less flexible and activation degrades faster than those of age-matched neurotypical participants.

CONCLUSIONS

These differing semantic network structures suggest that language retrieval difficulties in MS partially result from decline in language-specific factors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

尽管语言在多发性硬化症(MS)中通常被认为基本完整,但找词困难是常见的主诉。最近的研究表明,语言的衰退不仅仅是与 MS 最密切相关的运动和认知减速的结果。网络科学方法已被有效地用于研究网络结构与临床状况、衰老和语言的关系。本研究采用网络科学方法,调查与年龄匹配的神经典型同龄人相比,MS 患者是否表现出语义网络连接性降低和弹性降低。

方法

我们使用 89 名 MS 患者和 88 名神经典型参与者的语义流畅性数据来估计和分析每个参与者组的语义网络结构。此外,我们进行了渗流分析以检查每个网络的弹性。

结果

网络指标表明,与神经典型同龄人相比,MS 患者的局部和全局聚类系数较低,平均最短路径长度较长,模块度值较高。小世界性、网络肖像发散度测量和社区检测分析与这些结果一致,表明两个网络的宏观性质不同,MS 患者的语义网络比神经典型患者的网络更破碎。此外,扩散激活模拟和渗流分析表明,MS 患者的语义网络灵活性较低,激活退化速度比年龄匹配的神经典型参与者快。

结论

这些不同的语义网络结构表明,MS 中的语言检索困难部分是由于语言特定因素的下降所致。

相似文献

1
Multiple sclerosis is associated with differences in semantic memory structure.多发性硬化症与语义记忆结构的差异有关。
Neuropsychology. 2024 Jan;38(1):42-57. doi: 10.1037/neu0000924. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Age differences in semantic network structure: Acquiring knowledge shapes semantic memory.年龄对语义网络结构的影响:获取知识塑造语义记忆。
Psychol Aging. 2023 Mar;38(2):87-102. doi: 10.1037/pag0000721. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
The analysis of semantic networks in multiple sclerosis identifies preferential damage of long-range connectivity.对多发性硬化症语义网络的分析表明存在远程连接的优先损伤。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015 Sep;4(5):387-394. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
4
How retrieval processes change with age: Exploring age differences in semantic network and retrieval dynamics.检索过程如何随年龄变化:探索语义网络和检索动态中的年龄差异。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2025 Mar;79(1):109-123. doi: 10.1037/cep0000332. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
Quantifying flexibility in thought: The resiliency of semantic networks differs across the lifespan.量化思维灵活性:语义网络的弹性在整个生命周期中有所不同。
Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104631. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104631. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
6
Semantic fluency difficulties in developmental dyslexia and developmental language disorder (DLD): poor semantic structure of the lexicon or slower retrieval processes?发展性阅读障碍和发展性语言障碍(DLD)中的语义流畅性困难:词汇的语义结构较差还是检索过程较慢?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 Mar;55(2):200-215. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12512. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Characterization of language abilities and semantic networks in very preterm children at school-age.学龄期极早产儿语言能力和语义网络的特征分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 29;20(1):e0317535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317535. eCollection 2025.
8
Patterns of performance on the animal fluency task in logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia: A reflection of phonological and semantic skills.原发性进行性失语的言语流畅性变异型中动物流畅性任务的表现模式:语音和语义技能的反映。
J Commun Disord. 2024 Mar-Apr;108:106405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2024.106405. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
9
Graph Theory Analysis of Semantic Fluency in Russian-English Bilinguals.图论分析俄英双语者的语义流畅性。
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2022 Sep 1;35(3):179-187. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000312.
10
Dynamics of second-language learners' semantic memory networks: Evidence from a snowball sampling paradigm.第二语言学习者语义记忆网络的动态变化:来自雪球抽样范式的证据。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2025 Mar;79(1):98-108. doi: 10.1037/cep0000350. Epub 2024 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
"It's on the tip of my tongue!" exploring confrontation naming difficulties in patients with multiple sclerosis.“就在嘴边却说不出来!”探索多发性硬化症患者的命名困难
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023 Mar;71:104579. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104579. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Age differences in semantic network structure: Acquiring knowledge shapes semantic memory.年龄对语义网络结构的影响:获取知识塑造语义记忆。
Psychol Aging. 2023 Mar;38(2):87-102. doi: 10.1037/pag0000721. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
3
Structural differences in the semantic networks of younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人语义网络的结构差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 12;12(1):21459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11698-4.
4
Cerebral White Matter Mediation of Age-Related Differences in Picture Naming Across Adulthood.成年期图片命名中年龄相关差异的脑白质介导作用
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Mar 30;3(2):272-286. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00065. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Using Network Science and Psycholinguistic Megastudies to Examine the Dimensions of Phonological Similarity.运用网络科学和心理语言学大规模研究来探究语音相似性的维度。
Lang Speech. 2023 Mar;66(1):143-174. doi: 10.1177/00238309221095455. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
Semantic network analysis (SemNA): A tutorial on preprocessing, estimating, and analyzing semantic networks.语义网络分析(SemNA):关于语义网络预处理、估计和分析的教程。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Aug;28(4):860-879. doi: 10.1037/met0000463. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
7
Is the Mind a Network? Maps, Vehicles, and Skyhooks in Cognitive Network Science.心智是一个网络吗?认知网络科学中的地图、载体与天钩
Top Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;14(1):189-208. doi: 10.1111/tops.12570. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
8
Is computerized screening for processing speed impairment sufficient for identifying MS-related cognitive impairment in a clinical setting?在临床环境中,计算机化的处理速度障碍筛查是否足以识别与 MS 相关的认知障碍?
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Sep;54:103106. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103106. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
9
What Can Network Science Tell Us About Phonology and Language Processing?网络科学能告诉我们哪些关于音韵学和语言处理的信息?
Top Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;14(1):127-142. doi: 10.1111/tops.12532. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
10
Quantifying flexibility in thought: The resiliency of semantic networks differs across the lifespan.量化思维灵活性:语义网络的弹性在整个生命周期中有所不同。
Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104631. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104631. Epub 2021 Feb 24.