• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

堕胎禁令与先天性心脏病资源利用:决策分析。

Abortion Bans and Resource Utilization for Congenital Heart Disease: A Decision Analysis.

机构信息

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Obstetrics and the Division of Family Planning Services and Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep 1;142(3):652-659. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005291. Epub 2023 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005291
PMID:37535962
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the implications of potential national abortion ban scenarios on the incidence of neonatal single-ventricle cardiac defects.

METHODS

A decision tree model was developed to predict the incidence of neonatal single-ventricle cardiac defects and related outcomes in the United States under four theoretical national abortion bans: 1) abortion restrictions in existence immediately before the June 2022 Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision, 2) 20 weeks of gestation, 3) 13 weeks of gestation, and 4) a complete abortion ban. The model included incidence of live births of neonates with single-ventricle cardiac defects, neonatal heart surgery (including heart transplant and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]), and neonatal death. Cohort size was based on national pregnancy incidence and different algorithm decision point probabilities were aggregated from the existing literature. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted with 10,000 iterations per model.

RESULTS

In the scenario before the Dobbs decision, an estimated 6,369,000 annual pregnancies in the United States resulted in 1,006 annual cases of single-ventricle cardiac defects. Under a complete abortion ban, the model predicted a 53.7% increase in single-ventricle cardiac defects, or an additional 9 cases per 100,000 live births. This increase would result in an additional 531 neonatal heart surgeries, 16 heart transplants, 77 ECMO utilizations, and 102 neonatal deaths annually. More restrictive gestational age-based bans are predicted to confer increases in cases of neonatal single-ventricle cardiac defects and related adverse outcomes as well.

CONCLUSION

Universal abortion bans are estimated to increase the incidence of neonatal single-ventricle cardiac defects, associated morbidity, and resource utilization. States considering limiting abortion should consider the implications on the resources required to care for increasing number of children that will be born with significant and complex medical needs, including those with congenital heart disease.

摘要

目的

研究潜在的全国堕胎禁令情景对新生儿单心室心脏缺陷发病率的影响。

方法

采用决策树模型预测美国在四种理论性全国堕胎禁令下,新生儿单心室心脏缺陷及相关结局的发生率:1)2022 年 6 月多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案(Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization)之前的堕胎限制,2)20 周妊娠,3)13 周妊娠,4)完全堕胎禁令。该模型纳入了新生儿单心室心脏缺陷活产、新生儿心脏手术(包括心脏移植和体外膜肺氧合 [ECMO])和新生儿死亡的发生率。队列规模基于全国妊娠发生率,不同算法决策点的概率从现有文献中汇总。每个模型进行 10000 次蒙特卡罗模拟。

结果

在多布斯裁决之前的情景下,美国每年估计有 636.9 万例妊娠,导致每年有 1006 例单心室心脏缺陷。在完全堕胎禁令下,模型预测单心室心脏缺陷的发病率增加 53.7%,即每 10 万活产增加 9 例。这将导致每年额外增加 531 例新生儿心脏手术、16 例心脏移植、77 例 ECMO 应用和 102 例新生儿死亡。预计更严格的基于妊娠年龄的禁令也将导致新生儿单心室心脏缺陷病例和相关不良结局的增加。

结论

普遍的堕胎禁令估计会增加新生儿单心室心脏缺陷的发病率、相关发病率和资源利用。考虑限制堕胎的州应考虑到这对需要照顾越来越多患有重大和复杂医疗需求的儿童的资源的影响,包括患有先天性心脏病的儿童。

相似文献

1
Abortion Bans and Resource Utilization for Congenital Heart Disease: A Decision Analysis.堕胎禁令与先天性心脏病资源利用:决策分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep 1;142(3):652-659. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005291. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Infant Deaths After Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy.德克萨斯州 2021 年禁止早期妊娠堕胎后婴儿死亡。
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Aug 1;178(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0885.
3
Impact of abortion bans on pregnancies with severe life-limiting foetal anomalies in the United States: a cost-effectiveness analysis.美国堕胎禁令对患有严重危及生命的胎儿异常的妊娠的影响:一项成本效益分析。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2025 Jun;30(3):155-163. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2025.2469850. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
4
Projected Health Outcomes Associated With 3 US Supreme Court Decisions in 2022 on COVID-19 Workplace Protections, Handgun-Carry Restrictions, and Abortion Rights.2022 年美国最高法院关于 COVID-19 工作场所保护、携带枪支限制和堕胎权的三项裁决所涉预期健康结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2315578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15578.
5
Twenty-Week Abortion Bans on Pregnancies With a Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.20 周妊娠合并先天性膈疝终止妊娠禁令:成本效益分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;131(3):581-590. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002483.
6
Obstetrician and Gynecologist Physicians' Practice Locations Before and After the Dobbs Decision.多布斯裁决前后妇产科医生的执业地点
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e251608. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1608.
7
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后,与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势:州法律有多大影响?
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.
8
"I am putting my fear on them subconsciously": a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the U.S.“我在潜意识里将恐惧投射到她们身上”:在美国堕胎禁令背景下的避孕护理定性研究
Reprod Health. 2024 Nov 24;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01908-9.
9
Provision of Medications for Self-Managed Abortion Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.《多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案前后自行堕胎药物的供应》。
JAMA. 2024 May 14;331(18):1558-1564. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.4266.
10
Decision and economic analysis of hostile abortion laws compared with supportive abortion laws.敌对堕胎法与支持堕胎法的决策和经济分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Aug;5(8):101019. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101019. Epub 2023 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in maternal morbidity and infant outcomes following state-level abortion bans post-Dobbs: a comparative interrupted time series study.多布斯案后各州堕胎禁令对孕产妇发病率和婴儿结局的影响:一项比较中断时间序列研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23468-8.
2
Navigating women with congenital heart disease during pregnancy: Management strategies and future directions.孕期先天性心脏病女性的管理:策略与未来方向
World J Cardiol. 2025 Jun 26;17(6):106295. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i6.106295.
3
US Abortion Bans and Infant Mortality.
美国的堕胎禁令与婴儿死亡率
JAMA. 2025 Apr 15;333(15):1315-1323. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.28517.
4
Ethical Considerations in Fetal Cardiology.胎儿心脏病学中的伦理考量
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jun 1;11(6):172. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11060172.
5
Perinatal deaths attributable to congenital heart defects in Hunan Province, China, 2016-2020.2016 - 2020年中国湖南省先天性心脏病所致围产期死亡情况
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0304615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304615. eCollection 2024.
6
Maternal exposure to SSRIs or SNRIs and the risk of congenital abnormalities in offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis.母亲暴露于 SSRI 或 SNRIs 与后代先天性异常的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 29;18(11):e0294996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294996. eCollection 2023.