School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
College of Education Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210023, China.
Biol Psychol. 2023 Oct;183:108653. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108653. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
While the effect of interpersonal distance on forgiveness has been investigated over the past few years, it remains unclear whether this facilitating effect holds even when measured implicitly. Meanwhile, though cognitive control and the corresponding prefrontal cortex play a prominent role in forgiveness processing, the neural mechanism underlying forgiveness toward varied wrongdoers is largely unexplored. Here, forty-two participants initially underwent noise offense either from their friend or stranger, followed by a word identification test to examine their implicit attitude, during which they were presented with word-name combinations and required to categorize forgive- or complain-label words while ignoring the names of their friends or strangers below. A shorter reaction time reflects more congruence with one's implicit attitude. Electroencephalogram was recorded during the word identification test. Behaviorally, while individuals reacted faster to forgive-friend relative to complain-friend pairings, no such reaction bias was found for the stranger-wrongdoer, which suggests that individuals were more inclined to forgive someone close. Regarding the EEG/ERP results, forgive-friend elicited lower alpha oscillation and more negative frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) value than complain-friend combinations, suggesting increased and dominant activity in the right prefrontal network during forgiveness toward friends. Whereas complain- relative to forgive-stranger combinations elicited larger P3 amplitudes, suggesting a neural encoding bias to information associated with complaints about stranger-wrongdoer. These multimodal findings provide evidence for the benefits of closeness in forgiveness and shed light on the neural mechanisms underlying forgiveness toward different types of wrongdoers.
虽然人际距离对宽恕的影响在过去几年中得到了研究,但目前尚不清楚这种促进作用是否在隐含测量时仍然存在。同时,尽管认知控制和相应的前额叶皮层在宽恕处理中起着重要作用,但对不同冒犯者的宽恕的神经机制在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在这里,42 名参与者最初经历了来自朋友或陌生人的噪音冒犯,然后进行了单词识别测试,以检查他们的内隐态度,在此期间,他们会看到单词-名称组合,并要求他们对宽恕或抱怨标签词进行分类,同时忽略他们的朋友或陌生人的名字。较短的反应时间反映了与内隐态度的更大一致性。在单词识别测试过程中记录了脑电图。行为上,虽然个体对宽恕-朋友的反应比对抱怨-朋友的反应更快,但对陌生人-冒犯者的反应没有这种偏见,这表明个体更倾向于原谅亲近的人。关于 EEG/ERP 结果,与抱怨-朋友组合相比,宽恕-朋友组合诱发了较低的阿尔法振荡和更负的额部阿尔法不对称(FAA)值,这表明在对朋友的宽恕过程中,右前额网络的活动增加且占主导地位。而与抱怨-相比,宽恕-陌生人组合诱发了更大的 P3 振幅,这表明对与陌生人冒犯者相关的抱怨信息的神经编码偏向。这些多模态发现为亲密关系在宽恕中的益处提供了证据,并揭示了对不同类型冒犯者的宽恕的神经机制。