Department of Cardiac, Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Institute of Cardiology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Europace. 2023 Aug 2;25(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad239.
Patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies are usually younger and have a predominantly arrhythmia-related prognosis; they have nearly normal life expectancy thanks to the protection against sudden cardiac death provided by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is an effective alternative to the transvenous ICD and has evolved over the years. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of inappropriate shocks (IS), appropriate therapies, and device-related complications in patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies who underwent modern S-ICD implantation.
We enrolled consecutive patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies who had undergone implantation of a modern S-ICD from January 2016 to December 2020 and who were followed up until December 2022. A total of 1338 S-ICD implantations were performed within the observation period. Of these patients, 628 had cardiomyopathies or channelopathies. The rate of IS at 12 months was 4.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.8-6.9] in patients with cardiomyopathies and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.1-3.8) in patients with channelopathies (P = 0.032). No significant differences were noted over a median follow-up of 43 months [hazard ratio (HR): 0.76; 95% CI: 0.45-1.31; P = 0.351]. The rate of appropriate shocks at 12 months was 2.3% (95% CI: 1.1-4.1) in patients with cardiomyopathies and 2.1% (95% CI: 0.6-5.3) in patients with channelopathies (P = 1.0). The rate of device-related complications was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.3-2.3) and 3.2% (95% CI: 1.2-6.8), respectively (P = 0.074). No significant differences were noted over the entire follow-up. The need for pacing was low, occurring in 0.8% of patients.
Modern S-ICDs may be a valuable alternative to transvenous ICDs in patients with cardiomyopathies and channelopathies. Our findings suggest that modern S-ICD therapy carries a low rate of IS.
URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT02275637.
患有心肌病和通道病的患者通常更年轻,且主要具有与心律失常相关的预后;由于植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)能防止心源性猝死,他们的预期寿命几乎接近正常。皮下 ICD(S-ICD)是经静脉 ICD 的有效替代方法,并且多年来一直在不断发展。本研究旨在评估在接受现代 S-ICD 植入的患有心肌病和通道病的患者中,无感知电击(IS)、适当治疗和器械相关并发症的发生率。
我们连续纳入了 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受现代 S-ICD 植入且随访至 2022 年 12 月的患有心肌病和通道病的患者。在观察期内共进行了 1338 例 S-ICD 植入。其中 628 例患者患有心肌病或通道病。在 12 个月时,患有心肌病的患者的 IS 发生率为 4.6%(95%置信区间:2.8-6.9),患有通道病的患者为 1.1%(95%置信区间:0.1-3.8)(P=0.032)。在中位随访 43 个月时,未观察到显著差异[风险比(HR):0.76;95%置信区间:0.45-1.31;P=0.351]。在 12 个月时,患有心肌病的患者的适当电击发生率为 2.3%(95%置信区间:1.1-4.1),患有通道病的患者为 2.1%(95%置信区间:0.6-5.3)(P=1.0)。器械相关并发症的发生率分别为 0.9%(95%置信区间:0.3-2.3)和 3.2%(95%置信区间:1.2-6.8)(P=0.074)。在整个随访期间,未观察到显著差异。需要起搏的患者比例较低,为 0.8%。
现代 S-ICD 可能是患有心肌病和通道病患者的经静脉 ICD 的有效替代方法。我们的研究结果表明,现代 S-ICD 治疗的 IS 发生率较低。