Graduate School of Health and Sports Science, Doshisha University, 1-3 Tatara Miyakodani, Kyotanabe-shi, Kyoto-fu, 610-0394, Japan; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Kojimachi Business Center Building, 5-3-1 Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0083, Japan.
Faculty of Health and Sports Science, Doshisha University, 1-3 Tatara Miyakodani, Kyotanabe-shi, Kyoto-fu, 610-0394, Japan.
Med Eng Phys. 2023 Aug;118:104010. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.104010. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
The human shoulder complex's motion is modeled by nine rotational degrees of freedom (DoF) at the sternoclavicular (SC), acromioclavicular (AC), and glenohumeral joints. Non-invasive measurement of these rotations is desirable for shoulder kinematic assessment or musculoskeletal modeling. Accuracy of the conventional method for estimating SC posterior rotation is unclear and might be overestimated because it assumes no rotation in the AC joint. We aimed to explore whether our new method, allowing AC rotation, provides a more accurate estimation of SC posterior rotation than the conventional method. We compared estimates by both methods, in 18 postures among 8 healthy men, with those measured by the registration method from magnetic resonance images. Posthoc analyses showed significant differences between the registration and conventional methods in all 18 postures and in only one posture when compared to our method. While the conventional method tended toward overestimation and showed a 22.7° root-mean-square error for all postures, the new method had greater accuracy (6.8° root-mean-square error). By combining this method with the scapulothoracic rotation measurement method and other traditional methods, it should be possible to indirectly measure 3-DoF AC rotation, implying that non-invasive measurement of all 9-DoF rotations of the shoulder complex would now be possible.
人类肩复合体的运动由胸锁关节(SC)、肩锁关节(AC)和盂肱关节的九个旋转自由度(DoF)建模。非侵入性测量这些旋转对于肩部运动学评估或肌肉骨骼建模是理想的。传统方法估计 SC 后向旋转的准确性尚不清楚,并且可能被高估,因为它假设 AC 关节没有旋转。我们旨在探讨我们的新方法,允许 AC 旋转,是否比传统方法更准确地估计 SC 后向旋转。我们比较了 8 名健康男性的 18 个姿势中两种方法的估计值与磁共振成像注册方法测量的估计值。事后分析表明,在所有 18 个姿势中,注册方法与传统方法之间存在显著差异,而与我们的方法相比,仅在一个姿势中存在差异。虽然传统方法倾向于高估,并且所有姿势的均方根误差为 22.7°,但新方法的准确性更高(均方根误差为 6.8°)。通过将该方法与肩胛胸旋转测量方法和其他传统方法相结合,应该可以间接测量 3-DoF AC 旋转,这意味着现在可以非侵入性地测量肩复合体的所有 9-DoF 旋转。