Ludewig Paula M, Phadke Vandana, Braman Jonathan P, Hassett Daniel R, Cieminski Cort J, LaPrade Robert F
Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb;91(2):378-89. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01483.
Many prior studies have evaluated shoulder motion, yet no three-dimensional analysis comparing the combined clavicular, scapular, and humeral motion during arm elevation has been done. We aimed to describe and compare dynamic three-dimensional motion of the shoulder complex during raising and lowering the arm across three distinct elevation planes (flexion, scapular plane abduction, and coronal plane abduction).
Twelve subjects without a shoulder abnormality were enrolled. Transcortical pin placement into the clavicle, scapula, and humerus allowed electromagnetic motion sensors to be rigidly fixed. The subjects completed two repetitions of raising and lowering the arm in flexion, scapular, and abduction planes. Three-dimensional angles were calculated for sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral joint motions. Joint angles between humeral elevation planes and between raising and lowering of the arm were compared.
General patterns of shoulder motion observed during humeral elevation were clavicular elevation, retraction, and posterior axial rotation; scapular internal rotation, upward rotation, and posterior tilting relative to the clavicle; and glenohumeral elevation and external rotation. Clavicular posterior rotation predominated at the sternoclavicular joint (average, 31 degrees). Scapular posterior tilting predominated at the acromioclavicular joint (average, 19 degrees). Differences between flexion and abduction planes of humerothoracic elevation were largest for the glenohumeral joint plane of elevation (average, 46 degrees).
Overall shoulder motion consists of substantial angular rotations at each of the four shoulder joints, enabling the multiple-joint interaction required to elevate the arm overhead.
许多先前的研究已经评估了肩部运动,但尚未进行三维分析来比较手臂抬高过程中锁骨、肩胛骨和肱骨的联合运动。我们旨在描述和比较手臂在三个不同的抬高平面(屈曲、肩胛平面外展和冠状面外展)上升和下降过程中肩部复合体的动态三维运动。
招募了12名无肩部异常的受试者。通过将皮质针插入锁骨、肩胛骨和肱骨,使电磁运动传感器能够牢固固定。受试者在屈曲、肩胛和外展平面上完成两次手臂升降动作。计算胸锁关节、肩锁关节、肩胛胸壁关节和盂肱关节运动的三维角度。比较肱骨抬高平面之间以及手臂升降之间的关节角度。
肱骨抬高过程中观察到肩部运动的一般模式为锁骨抬高、后缩和轴向向后旋转;肩胛骨相对于锁骨进行内旋、上旋和向后倾斜;以及盂肱关节抬高和外旋。胸锁关节处锁骨向后旋转占主导(平均31度)。肩锁关节处肩胛骨向后倾斜占主导(平均19度)。肱骨胸廓抬高的屈曲和外展平面之间的差异在盂肱关节抬高平面上最大(平均46度)。
整体肩部运动包括四个肩关节各自的大量角旋转,从而实现将手臂举过头顶所需的多关节相互作用。