Marin Lina M, Katselis George S, Chumala Paulos, Sanche Stephen, Julseth Lucas, Penz Erika, Skomro Robert, Siqueira Walter L
College of Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 2Z4, Canada.
Clin Proteomics. 2023 Aug 3;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12014-023-09417-w.
The detection of SARS-CoV-2 biomarkers by real time PCR (rRT-PCR) has shown that the sensitivity of the test is negatively affected by low viral loads and the severity of the disease. This limitation can be overcome by the use of more sensitive approaches such as mass spectrometry (MS), which has not been explored for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 proteins in saliva. Thus, this study aimed at assessing the translational applicability of mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches to identify viral proteins in saliva from people diagnosed with COVID-19 within fourteen days after the initial diagnosis, and to compare its performance with rRT-PCR. After ethics approval, saliva samples were self-collected by 42 COVID-19 positive and 16 healthy individuals. Samples from people positive for COVID-19 were collected on average on the sixth day (± 4 days) after initial diagnosis. Viable viral particles in saliva were heat-inactivated followed by the extraction of total proteins and viral RNA. Proteins were digested and then subjected to tandem MS analysis (LC-QTOF-MS/MS) using a data-dependent MS/MS acquisition qualitative shotgun proteomics approach. The acquired spectra were queried against a combined SARS-CoV-2 and human database. The qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific RNA was done by rRT-PCR. SARS-CoV-2 proteins were identified in all COVID-19 samples (100%), while viral RNA was detected in only 24 out of 42 COVID-19 samples (57.1%). Seven out of 18 SARS-CoV-2 proteins were identified in saliva from COVID-19 positive individuals, from which the most frequent were replicase polyproteins 1ab (100%) and 1a (91.3%), and nucleocapsid (45.2%). Neither viral proteins nor RNA were detected in healthy individuals. Our mass spectrometry approach appears to be more sensitive than rRT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 biomarkers in saliva collected from COVID-19 positive individuals up to 14 days after the initial diagnostic test. Based on the novel data presented here, our MS technology can be used as an effective diagnostic test of COVID-19 for initial diagnosis or follow-up of symptomatic cases, especially in patients with reduced viral load.
通过实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)生物标志物发现,检测的敏感性受到低病毒载量和疾病严重程度的负面影响。这种局限性可以通过使用更灵敏的方法(如质谱分析法(MS))来克服,而质谱分析法尚未用于检测唾液中的SARS-CoV-2蛋白。因此,本研究旨在评估基于质谱的蛋白质组学方法在初诊后14天内从确诊为新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的患者唾液中鉴定病毒蛋白的转化适用性,并将其性能与rRT-PCR进行比较。在获得伦理批准后,42名COVID-19阳性患者和16名健康个体自行采集唾液样本。COVID-19阳性患者的样本平均在初诊后第6天(±4天)采集。唾液中的活病毒颗粒经热灭活后,提取总蛋白和病毒RNA。对蛋白质进行消化,然后采用数据依赖型MS/MS采集定性鸟枪法蛋白质组学方法进行串联质谱分析(液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间串联质谱法(LC-QTOF-MS/MS))。将获得的光谱与SARS-CoV-2和人类的联合数据库进行比对。通过rRT-PCR对SARS-CoV-2特异性RNA进行定性检测。在所有COVID-19样本(100%)中均鉴定出SARS-CoV-2蛋白,而在42份COVID-19样本中仅24份(57.1%)检测到病毒RNA。在COVID-19阳性个体的唾液中鉴定出18种SARS-CoV-2蛋白中的7种,其中最常见的是复制酶多聚蛋白1ab(100%)和1a(91.3%),以及核衣壳蛋白(45.2%)。在健康个体中未检测到病毒蛋白和RNA。对于从COVID-19阳性个体在初次诊断测试后14天内采集的唾液中检测SARS-CoV-2生物标志物,我们的质谱分析法似乎比rRT-PCR更灵敏。基于此处呈现的新数据,我们的质谱技术可作为COVID-19的有效诊断测试方法,用于初始诊断或有症状病例的随访,尤其是在病毒载量降低的患者中。