Liebowitz M R
Schizophr Bull. 1979;5(1):23-38. doi: 10.1093/schbul/5.1.23.
There is no agreement in American psychiatry as to whether borderline should be regarded as a distinct entity. A review of the major viewpoints in the field reveals that borderline is variously used to designate: (1) a clinical disorder distinguishable by behavioral criteria; (2) a milder form of schizophrenia; (3) a nonspecific term encompassing several atypical affective disorders; (4) a psychostructural distinction. When the St. Louis approach to diagnostic validity is used as a guideline, the conclusion reached is that available data do not weigh conclusively for or against borderline's status as an independent entity. In particular, borderline, as defined by several investigators, appears distinct from schizophrenia, but requires further delimitation from the affective disorders.
在美国精神病学领域,对于边缘型人格障碍是否应被视为一种独特的实体尚无定论。对该领域主要观点的回顾表明,“边缘型”被以多种方式用于指代:(1)一种可通过行为标准区分的临床疾病;(2)精神分裂症的一种较轻形式;(3)一个涵盖多种非典型情感障碍的非特定术语;(4)一种心理结构上的区别。当以圣路易斯诊断效度方法作为指导方针时,得出的结论是,现有数据并未明确支持或反对边缘型人格障碍作为一个独立实体的地位。特别是,几位研究者所定义的边缘型人格障碍似乎与精神分裂症不同,但需要与情感障碍进一步区分开来。