Langan Robert, Krause Ryan, Menz Markus
University of Geneva.
Texas Christian University.
J Manage. 2023 Sep;49(7):2218-2253. doi: 10.1177/01492063221102394. Epub 2022 May 31.
Traditional agency theory views the proper role of the board chair exclusively as providing independent oversight to monitor and control the CEO. Recently, firms have introduced innovations in board leadership that have confounded these theoretical expectations. One notable innovation is the executive board chair, a corporate governance hybrid responsible for both oversight and strategic decision-making, challenging agency theory's prescription that the two activities remain separate. In this study, we argue that an executive board chair position can resolve the trade-off between independent oversight and involvement in strategy and therefore generate a performance advantage. We also predict that, owing to the blurring of lines between the CEO and board chair roles that the executive board chair position creates, the relationship will be stronger the greater the need to monitor and control the CEO but weaker when organizational complexity and board leadership demands are greater. Analysis of S&P .
传统的代理理论认为董事会主席的恰当角色仅仅是提供独立监督,以监管和控制首席执行官。最近,企业在董事会领导方面进行了创新,这使这些理论预期变得复杂。一项显著的创新是执行董事会主席,这是一种公司治理混合模式,负责监督和战略决策,挑战了代理理论中这两项活动应保持分离的规定。在本研究中,我们认为执行董事会主席职位能够解决独立监督与参与战略之间的权衡问题,从而产生绩效优势。我们还预测,由于执行董事会主席职位所造成的首席执行官与董事会主席角色界限的模糊,在对首席执行官进行监督和控制的需求越大时,这种关系会越强,但在组织复杂性和董事会领导要求越高时则会越弱。标准普尔的分析……