Apea Ohene B, Akorley Edem Bennet, Oyelude Emmanuel O, Ampadu Boateng
Department of Applied Chemistry, C. K. Tedem University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Ghana.
Department of Environmental Science, C. K. Tedem University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Ghana.
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 17;9(7):e18343. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18343. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Ceramic water filters (CWFs) are globally employed as a point-of-use water treatment technology. Although, there are no standards to regulate the use of these CWFs in developing countries, they are gaining acceptability for domestic water treatment. This study sought to assess and compare the efficiency of commercially available types of CWFs and to propose a consumer selection guide for the purchase and use of CWFs. The CWFs selected for the study were, Ball filter with activated carbon (BF + AC), Candle filter (CF), and Pot filter (PFcs) coated with colloidal silver. The elemental and mineral oxide composition of the selected CWFs were analysed with x-ray fluorescence method. Furthermore, the raw unfiltered water (from three different common sources), and the filtrates obtained with the CWFs were analysed for their physicochemical, metal ion removability, and microbial correction. The x-ray fluorescence analysis indicated that AlO and SiO were the major mineral oxide compositions of the selected CWFs. These metal oxides were present in varying concentrations. The CWFs showed turbidity reduction of 74.28-99.40%, Mn and Fe reduction of 54.04-98.48% and 48.82-97.50% respectively. In addition, the total coliform reduction by the selected CWFs ranged from 2.31 to 76.97%. It was therefore observed from the results that, the efficiency of commercially available CWFs varied in the order BF + AC > CF > PFcs. BF + AC was the most efficient in both physicochemical and microbial correction of all water sources. CWF selection guide for consumers based on different sources of water which considered the physicochemical parameters, biological parameters and Water Quality Index was discussed. This has an implication for regulation and standardization of CWFs.
陶瓷水过滤器(CWFs)在全球范围内被用作一种家庭用水处理技术。尽管在发展中国家没有标准来规范这些CWFs的使用,但它们在家庭水处理中越来越被接受。本研究旨在评估和比较市售类型CWFs的效率,并为CWFs的购买和使用提出一份消费者选择指南。本研究选择的CWFs有带活性炭的球型过滤器(BF + AC)、烛式过滤器(CF)和涂有胶体银的罐式过滤器(PFcs)。采用X射线荧光法分析了所选CWFs的元素和矿物氧化物组成。此外,还对未经过滤的原水(来自三种不同的常见水源)以及用CWFs获得的滤液进行了物理化学、金属离子去除能力和微生物校正分析。X射线荧光分析表明,AlO和SiO是所选CWFs的主要矿物氧化物组成。这些金属氧化物的浓度各不相同。CWFs的浊度降低率为74.28 - 99.40%,锰和铁的降低率分别为54.04 - 98.48%和48.82 - 97.50%。此外,所选CWFs对总大肠菌群的降低率在2.31%至76.97%之间。因此,从结果中可以看出,市售CWFs的效率顺序为BF + AC > CF > PFcs。BF + AC在所有水源的物理化学和微生物校正方面都是最有效的。讨论了基于不同水源的CWF消费者选择指南,该指南考虑了物理化学参数、生物学参数和水质指数。这对CWFs的监管和标准化具有重要意义。