Institute of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA Medecins Sans Frontieres, New York, NY, USA Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna, Galle, Sri Lanka Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Nov;17(11):1361-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03082.x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
There is little information about continued use of point-of-use technologies after disaster relief efforts. After the 2004 tsunami, the Red Cross distributed ceramic water filters in Sri Lanka. This study determined factors associated with filter disuse and evaluate the quality of household drinking water.
A cross-sectional survey of water sources and treatment, filter use and household characteristics was administered by in-person oral interview, and household water quality was tested. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model probability of filter non-use.
At the time of survey, 24% of households (107/452) did not use filters; the most common reason given was breakage (42%). The most common household water sources were taps and wells. Wells were used by 45% of filter users and 28% of non-users. Of households with taps, 75% had source water Escherichia coli in the lowest World Health Organisation risk category (<1/100 ml), vs. only 30% of households reporting wells did. Tap households were approximately four times more likely to discontinue filter use than well households.
After 2 years, 24% of households were non-users. The main factors were breakage and household water source; households with taps were more likely to stop use than households with wells. Tap water users also had higher-quality source water, suggesting that disuse is not necessarily negative and monitoring of water quality can aid decision-making about continued use. To promote continued use, disaster recovery filter distribution efforts must be joined with capacity building for long-term water monitoring, supply chains and local production.
有关灾难救援工作结束后继续使用即时水质处理技术的信息很少。2004 年海啸后,红十字会在斯里兰卡分发了陶瓷滤水器。本研究旨在确定导致滤水器停止使用的因素,并评估家庭饮用水的质量。
通过个人口头访谈对水源和处理方法、滤水器使用情况以及家庭特征进行了横断面调查,并对家庭用水质量进行了测试。采用多变量逻辑回归模型对滤水器未使用的概率进行建模。
在调查时,24%的家庭(107/452)未使用滤水器;最常见的原因是滤水器损坏(42%)。最常见的家庭用水来源是水龙头和水井。45%的滤水器使用者和 28%的非使用者使用水井。在使用水龙头的家庭中,有 75%的家庭水源水中大肠埃希氏菌处于世界卫生组织风险最低类别(<1/100ml),而报告使用水井的家庭中仅有 30%的水源水处于该类别。使用水龙头的家庭停止使用滤水器的可能性是使用水井家庭的约四倍。
两年后,24%的家庭不再使用滤水器。主要因素是滤水器损坏和家庭用水来源;使用水龙头的家庭比使用水井的家庭更有可能停止使用滤水器。使用水龙头的家庭水源水的质量也更高,这表明停止使用滤水器不一定是负面的,对水质的监测可以帮助决策是否继续使用滤水器。为了促进继续使用,灾难恢复滤水器分配工作必须与长期水质监测、供应链和本地生产的能力建设相结合。