Völter Christiane, Fricke Hannah, Faour Sarah, Lueg Gero, Nasreddine Ziad S, Götze Lisa, Dawes Piers
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Hospital Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Jul 19;15:1209385. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1209385. eCollection 2023.
Hearing loss and dementia are highly prevalent in older age and often co-occur. Most neurocognitive screening tests are auditory-based, and performance can be affected by hearing loss. To address the need for a cognitive screening test suitable for people with hearing loss, a visual version of the Montreal-Cognitive-Assessment was developed and recently validated in English (MoCA-H), with good sensitivity and specificity for identifying cases of dementia. As the MoCA is known to perform differently across languages, revalidation of the German MoCA-H was necessary. The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the German MoCA-H among those with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia and to determine an appropriate performance cut- off.
A total of 346 participants aged 60-97 years (M = 77.18, SD = 9.56) were included; 160 were cognitively healthy, 79 with MCI and 107 were living with dementia based on the GPCOG and a detailed medical questionnaire as well as a comprehensive examination by a neurologist in case of cognitive impairment. Performance cut-offs for normal cognition, MCI and dementia were estimated for the MoCA-H score and z-scores using the English MoCA-H cut-off, the balanced cut-off and the Youden's Index.
A mean score of 25.49 (SD = 3.01) points in the German MoCA-H was achieved in cognitively healthy participants, 20.08 (SD = 2.29) in the MCI and 15.80 (SD = 3.85) in the dementia group. The optimum cut-off for the detection of dementia was ≤21 points with a sensitivity of 96.3% and a specificity of 90%. In the MCI group, a cut-off range between 22 and 24 points is proposed to increase diagnostic accuracy to a sensitivity and specificity of 97.5 and 90%, respectively.
The German MoCA-H seems to be a sensitive screening test for MCI and dementia and should replace commonly used auditory-based cognitive screening tests in older adults. The choice of a cut-off range might help to better reflect the difficulty in clinical reality in detecting MCI. However, screening test batteries cannot replace a comprehensive cognitive evaluation.
听力损失和痴呆在老年人中极为普遍,且常常同时出现。大多数神经认知筛查测试基于听觉,其表现可能会受到听力损失的影响。为满足对适合听力损失患者的认知筛查测试的需求,开发了蒙特利尔认知评估的视觉版本(MoCA-H),并于近期进行了英文验证,在识别痴呆病例方面具有良好的敏感性和特异性。由于已知MoCA在不同语言中的表现存在差异,因此有必要对德语版MoCA-H进行重新验证。本研究的目的是评估德语版MoCA-H在认知正常、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆患者中的诊断准确性,并确定合适的表现临界值。
共纳入346名年龄在60 - 97岁之间的参与者(M = 77.18,SD = 9.56);160名认知健康,79名患有MCI,107名患有痴呆,诊断依据GPCOG、详细的医学问卷以及认知障碍时由神经科医生进行的全面检查。使用英文MoCA-H临界值、平衡临界值和尤登指数,对MoCA-H分数和z分数估计认知正常、MCI和痴呆的表现临界值。
认知健康参与者的德语版MoCA-H平均得分为25.49(SD = 3.01)分,MCI组为20.08(SD = 2.29)分,痴呆组为15.80(SD = 3.85)分。检测痴呆的最佳临界值为≤21分,敏感性为96.3%,特异性为90%。在MCI组中,建议临界值范围在22至24分之间,以将诊断准确性提高到敏感性和特异性分别为97.5%和90%。
德语版MoCA-H似乎是一种用于MCI和痴呆的敏感筛查测试,应取代老年人常用基于听觉的认知筛查测试。选择临界值范围可能有助于更好地反映临床实际中检测MCI的难度。然而,筛查测试组合不能替代全面的认知评估。