Suppr超能文献

评估创伤与矫形外科的转诊情况:急诊科和紧急护理中虚拟骨折诊所交通信号灯系统的评估

Assessing Referrals to a Trauma and Orthopaedic Department: Evaluation of a Traffic Light System for Virtual Fracture Clinic in the Emergency Department and Urgent Care.

作者信息

Menyah Effie, Garcia Sean M, McCormack Ann, Taiwo Babajide, Aly Mohamed, Kamel Walid, Dhinsa Baljinder S

机构信息

Trauma and Orthopaedics, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, GBR.

Orthopaedics, Alexandria University, Alexandria, EGY.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 3;15(7):e41316. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41316. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Background The Trauma and Orthopaedic (T&O) on-call service receives referrals from the emergency department (ED), general practice (GP) and urgent treatment centres (UTCs) and requests for inpatient reviews. The virtual fracture clinic (VFC) pathway allows ED and UTC clinicians to assess, discharge and refer when necessary. For VFC, the on-call orthopaedic consultant reviews the cases the next working day and makes an appropriate plan. This pathway consists of a traffic light system, in which practitioners can either safely discharge with written advice (green), refer to the VFC (yellow) or refer to the on-call team (red). Method The aim of this study was to assess how the VFC pathway was being utilised. All referrals to the T&O on-call team over three weeks were evaluated retrospectively. The following referrals were excluded: fractured femur, head injury, trauma calls and back pain pathway. The following data were collected: patient details, diagnosis, referral source, reason for referral, plan, double booking with VFC and appropriateness. Results A total of 191 referrals were analysed. Most referrals are from the ED (51%) and UTC (23%). Of the referrals, 39% were deemed to be inappropriate. Of the inappropriate referrals, 35% should have been referred directly to the VFC rather than the on-call team. A significant minority (7%) of inappropriate referrals were referred to the on-call team and VFC. Conclusion Education and collaboration are required with the ED and UTC to ensure the proper use of the VFC pathway. Immediate radiograph reporting may also be beneficial.

摘要

背景

创伤与矫形(T&O)值班服务接收来自急诊科(ED)、全科医疗(GP)和紧急治疗中心(UTC)的转诊以及住院复查请求。虚拟骨折诊所(VFC)路径使ED和UTC的临床医生能够在必要时进行评估、出院和转诊。对于VFC,值班骨科顾问会在接下来的工作日审查病例并制定适当的计划。该路径由一个交通灯系统组成,从业者可以根据书面建议安全出院(绿色)、转诊至VFC(黄色)或转诊至值班团队(红色)。方法:本研究的目的是评估VFC路径的使用情况。对三周内所有转诊至T&O值班团队的病例进行回顾性评估。排除以下转诊病例:股骨骨折、头部损伤、创伤呼叫和背痛路径。收集以下数据:患者详细信息、诊断、转诊来源、转诊原因、计划、与VFC的重复预约以及适当性。结果:共分析了191例转诊病例。大多数转诊来自ED(51%)和UTC(23%)。在这些转诊病例中,39%被认为是不适当的。在不适当的转诊病例中,35%本应直接转诊至VFC而非值班团队。一小部分(7%)不适当的转诊病例同时被转诊至值班团队和VFC。结论:需要与ED和UTC进行教育和协作,以确保正确使用VFC路径。即时X光报告可能也有益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a0/10395551/72d747e10589/cureus-0015-00000041316-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验