Suppr超能文献

随机对照试验抗精神病药对自闭症谱系障碍的人:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Randomised controlled trials of antipsychotics for people with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, 2nd Floor Commonwealth Building, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.

Hereford and Worcestershire Health and Care Trust, Kings Court, 2 Charles Hastings Way, WR5 1JR, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2023 Dec;53(16):7964-7972. doi: 10.1017/S003329172300212X. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite unclear evidence to support the long-term use of antipsychotics to treat challenging (problem) behaviours in people with autism in the absence of a psychiatric disorder, this practice is common.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving antipsychotics for people with autism of all ages, irrespective of the outcomes assessed. We searched seven databases and hand-searched ten relevant journals. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full papers and extracted data using the Cochrane Handbook template. We conducted meta-analyses of outcomes and the rate of adverse events.

RESULTS

We included 39 papers based on 21 primary RCTs that recruited 1482 people with autism. No RCT assessed any psychiatric disorder outcome, such as psychoses or bipolar disorder. A meta-analysis of ten placebo-controlled RCTs showed a significantly improved Aberrant Behaviour Checklist-Irritability score in the antipsychotic group with an effect size of -6.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) -8.13 to -4.77] (low certainty). Pooled Clinical Global Impression data on 11 placebo-controlled RCTs showed an overall effect size of 0.84 (95% CI 0.48 to 1.21) (moderate certainty). There was a significantly higher risk of overall adverse effects ( = 0.003) and also weight gain ( < 0.00001), sedation ( < 0.00001) and increased appetite ( = 0.001) in the antipsychotic group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence for risperidone and preliminary evidence for aripiprazole to significantly improve scores on some outcome measures among children with autism but not adults or for any other antipsychotics. There is a definite increased risk of antipsychotic-related different adverse effects.

摘要

背景

尽管没有明确的证据支持在没有精神障碍的情况下,长期使用抗精神病药物治疗自闭症患者的挑战性(问题)行为,但这种做法很常见。

方法

我们对所有涉及自闭症患者(无论年龄大小)的抗精神病药物的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,无论评估的结果如何。我们检索了七个数据库,并对十本相关期刊进行了手工检索。两位作者独立筛选标题、摘要和全文,并使用 Cochrane 手册模板提取数据。我们对结局和不良事件发生率进行了荟萃分析。

结果

我们纳入了 39 篇基于 21 项主要 RCT 的论文,共纳入了 1482 名自闭症患者。没有 RCT 评估任何精神障碍结局,如精神病或双相情感障碍。对 10 项安慰剂对照 RCT 的荟萃分析显示,抗精神病药物组的异常行为检查表-烦躁评分显著改善,效应量为-6.45 [95%置信区间(CI)-8.13 至-4.77](低确定性)。对 11 项安慰剂对照 RCT 的汇总临床总体印象数据显示,总体效应量为 0.84 [95% CI 0.48 至 1.21](中等确定性)。抗精神病药物组的总体不良事件风险显著升高( = 0.003),体重增加( < 0.00001)、镇静( < 0.00001)和食欲增加( = 0.001)的风险也显著升高。

结论

利培酮和阿立哌唑有一定的证据可显著改善自闭症儿童的某些结局评分,但不能改善成人或其他任何抗精神病药物的结局评分。抗精神病药物相关的不良反应风险明显增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验