Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique 1433, INSERM, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
F-CRIN INI-CRCT (Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists), INSERM U1116, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Oct;25(10):1797-1805. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2982. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
In patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) empagliflozin produced greater clinical benefit than placebo. Many patients with AHF are treated with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). The interplay between empagliflozin and MRAs in AHF is yet to be explored. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin versus placebo according to MRA use at baseline in the EMPULSE trial (NCT04157751).
In this analysis all comparisons were performed between empagliflozin and placebo, stratified by baseline MRA use. The primary outcome included all-cause death, heart failure events, and a ≥5 point difference in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) total symptom score at 90 days, assessed using the win ratio (WR). First heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death was a secondary outcome. From the 530 patients randomized, 276 (52%) were receiving MRAs at baseline. MRA users were younger, had lower ejection fraction, better renal function, and higher KCCQ scores. The primary outcome showed benefit of empagliflozin irrespective of baseline MRA use (WR 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.97 and WR 1.27, 95% CI 0.93-1.73 in MRA users and non-users, respectively; interaction p = 0.52). The effect of empagliflozin on first heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death was not modified by MRA use (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% CI 0.30-1.11 and HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.47-1.52 in MRA users and non-users, respectively; interaction p = 0.39). Investigator-reported and severe hyperkalaemia events were infrequent (<6%) irrespective of MRA use.
In patients admitted for AHF, initiation of empagliflozin produced clinical benefit and was well tolerated irrespective of background MRA use. These findings support the early use of empagliflozin on top of MRA therapy in patients admitted for AHF.
在因急性心力衰竭(AHF)住院的患者中,恩格列净比安慰剂产生了更大的临床获益。许多 AHF 患者接受了盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)的治疗。恩格列净和 MRA 在 AHF 中的相互作用尚未得到探索。本研究旨在评估 EMPULSE 试验(NCT04157751)中基线时使用 MRA 的情况下,恩格列净与安慰剂相比的疗效和安全性。
在这项分析中,所有比较均在基线时使用 MRA 的情况下,在恩格列净和安慰剂之间进行分层。主要结局包括全因死亡、心力衰竭事件以及堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)总症状评分在 90 天时相差≥5 分,使用胜率(WR)进行评估。首次心力衰竭住院或心血管死亡是次要结局。在随机的 530 名患者中,276 名(52%)在基线时正在使用 MRA。MRA 使用者年龄较小,射血分数较低,肾功能较好,KCCQ 评分较高。主要结局显示,无论基线时是否使用 MRA,恩格列净均有益(WR1.46,95%置信区间[CI]1.08-1.97 和 WR1.27,95%CI0.93-1.73,在 MRA 使用者和非使用者中分别;交互作用 p=0.52)。恩格列净对首次心力衰竭住院或心血管死亡的影响不受 MRA 使用的影响(危险比[HR]0.58,95%CI0.30-1.11 和 HR0.85,95%CI0.47-1.52,在 MRA 使用者和非使用者中分别;交互作用 p=0.39)。无论是否使用 MRA,研究者报告的和严重高钾血症事件均较为少见(<6%)。
在因 AHF 住院的患者中,起始恩格列净治疗可带来临床获益,且无论背景 MRA 使用情况如何,均具有良好的耐受性。这些发现支持在因 AHF 住院的患者中,早期在 MRA 治疗的基础上使用恩格列净。