Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉旁路移植术:来自 BYPASS 注册研究的患者与来自大学医院的患者的对比研究。

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Comparative Exercise between Patients from the BYPASS Registry and Patients from a University Hospital.

机构信息

Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Aug 4;38(5):e20220026. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0026.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) data provided by the Brazilian Registry of Cardiovascular Surgeries in Adults (BYPASS) Registry is a Brazilian reality.

OBJECTIVE

To carry out a comparative exercise between the BYPASS Registry published data and data from patients operated on in a randomly chosen period (2013-2015) at Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMRP-USP).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study reviewing 173 electronic medical records of CABG patients from the HCFMRP-USP. These data were compared with the BYPASS Registry published data. Chi-square test was used to verify the changes within the prevalence of adequate/inadequate biochemical tests before and after surgery. The sample was divided into groups consistent with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (CPB ≤ 120 minutes and CPB > 120 minutes). For the complications, prevalence by the chi-square test was adopted. Significant P-values are < 0.05.

RESULTS

The comparative operative data of the BYPASS Registry and the HCFMRP-USP patients were quite similar, except for the isolate use of only arterial grafts, which was more frequent on HCFMRP-USP patients (30.8% vs. 15.9%), and the use of radial artery, also more frequent on HCFMRP-USP patients (48.8% vs. 1.1%).

CONCLUSION

The comparative study suggested that the BYPASS Registry should be a reference for CABG quality control.

摘要

简介

巴西成人心血管手术注册(BYPASS)登记处提供的冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)数据反映了巴西的真实情况。

目的

对 BYPASS 登记处公布的数据与在随机选择的时间段(2013-2015 年)在圣保罗大学里贝朗普雷托医学院附属医院胸科中心(HCFMRP-USP)接受手术的患者的数据进行比较。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,分析了 HCFMRP-USP 行 CABG 的 173 例患者的电子病历。将这些数据与 BYPASS 登记处公布的数据进行比较。采用卡方检验验证手术前后生化检查充分/不充分的比例变化。根据体外循环(CPB)时间(CPB≤120 分钟和 CPB>120 分钟)将样本分为两组。采用卡方检验评估并发症的发生率。P 值<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。

结果

BYPASS 登记处和 HCFMRP-USP 患者的手术比较数据非常相似,除了 HCFMRP-USP 患者更常单独使用动脉移植物(30.8% vs. 15.9%),以及更常使用桡动脉(48.8% vs. 1.1%)。

结论

该比较研究表明,BYPASS 登记处应作为 CABG 质量控制的参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab82/10399587/4d5dd2e80907/bjcvs-38-05-e20220026-g01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验