• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国皮下植入式心律转复除颤器应用的真实世界证据:单中心经验。

Real-world evidence for the use of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in China: A single-center experience.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xietu Road, 1069, Shanghai, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Herz. 2023 Dec;48(6):462-469. doi: 10.1007/s00059-023-05192-4. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00059-023-05192-4
PMID:37540305
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) have been shown to be non-inferior to transvenous ICDs in the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD), but there is still a lack of evidence from clinical trials in China. We investigated whether S‑ICD implantation in the Chinese population is safe and feasible and should be promoted in the future.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing S‑ICD implantation at our center were enrolled in this retrospective study. Data were collected within the median follow-up period of 554 days. Data concerning patient selection, implantation procedures, complications, and episodes of shock were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 70.2% of all 47 patients (median age = 39 years) were included for secondary prevention of SCD with different etiologies. Vector screening showed that 98% of patients were with > 1 appropriate vector in all postures. An intraoperative defibrillation test was not performed on six patients because of the high risk of disease deterioration, while all episodes of ventricular fibrillation induced post implantation were terminated by one shock. As expected, no severe complications (e.g., infection and device-related complications) were observed, except for one case of delayed healing of the incision. Overall, 15 patients (31.9%) experienced appropriate shocks (AS) with all episodes terminated by one shock. Two patients (4.3%) experienced inappropriate shocks (IAS) due to noise oversensing, resulting in a high Kaplan-Meier IAS-free rate of 95.7%.

CONCLUSION

Based on appropriate patient selection and standardized implantation procedures, this real-world study confirmed the safety and efficacy of S‑ICD in Chinese patients, indicating that it may help to promote the prevention of SCD in China.

摘要

背景

皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)在预防心源性猝死(SCD)方面已被证明不劣于经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD),但中国仍缺乏临床试验证据。我们研究了 S-ICD 在中国人群中的植入是否安全可行,以及将来是否应该推广。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了在我院行 S-ICD 植入术的连续患者。中位随访时间为 554 天,收集了患者选择、植入程序、并发症和电击事件的数据。

结果

共有 47 例患者(中位年龄 39 岁)符合纳入标准,其中 70.2%为 SCD 二级预防,病因各异。向量筛查显示,98%的患者在所有体位下均有>1 个合适的向量。由于疾病恶化风险高,有 6 例患者未行术中除颤测试,而所有植入后诱发的室颤均经一次电击终止。不出所料,除 1 例切口愈合延迟外,未观察到严重并发症(如感染和器械相关并发症)。总体而言,15 例(31.9%)患者发生了适当的电击(AS),所有电击均由一次电击终止。2 例(4.3%)患者因噪声过感知发生了不适当的电击(IAS),Kaplan-Meier 无 IAS 率高达 95.7%。

结论

基于合适的患者选择和标准化的植入程序,本真实世界研究证实了 S-ICD 在我国患者中的安全性和有效性,表明它可能有助于促进我国 SCD 的预防。

相似文献

1
Real-world evidence for the use of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in China: A single-center experience.中国皮下植入式心律转复除颤器应用的真实世界证据:单中心经验。
Herz. 2023 Dec;48(6):462-469. doi: 10.1007/s00059-023-05192-4. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
2
Long-Term Experience With the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Teenagers and Young Adults.青少年和年轻成人中皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器的长期经验
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec 26;3(13):1499-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
3
Appropriate and inappropriate shocks in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: An international multicenter study.肥厚型心肌病患者皮下植入式心律转复除颤器中的适当和不适当电击:一项国际多中心研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jul;17(7):1107-1114. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
4
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in paediatric practice: a single-centre UK experience with focus on subcutaneous defibrillation.小儿经皮心脏除颤器治疗:英国单中心经验,重点关注皮下除颤。
Europace. 2013 Apr;15(4):523-30. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus388. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
5
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: A tertiary center experience.皮下植入式心脏除颤器:一家三级中心的经验。
Cardiol J. 2019;26(5):543-549. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0050. Epub 2018 May 2.
6
Effectiveness of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and determinants of inappropriate shock delivery.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器的有效性及不适当电击发放的决定因素。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;232:176-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.034. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
7
Oversensing issues leading to device extraction: When subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator reached a dead-end.导致设备取出的感知过度问题:当皮下植入式心律转复除颤器走到尽头时。
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jan;17(1):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
8
Propensity score matched comparison of subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in the SIMPLE and EFFORTLESS studies.SIMPLE 和 EFFORTLESS 研究中皮下植入式和经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的倾向评分匹配比较。
Europace. 2018 Sep 1;20(FI2):f240-f248. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy083.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients at High Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death - Primary Japanese Experience.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器在高危心源性猝死患者中的安全性和有效性:日本初步经验。
Circ J. 2018 May 25;82(6):1546-1551. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1001. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
10
Efficacy and Complications of Subcutaneous versus Conventional Cardioverter Defibrillators: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.皮下与传统心脏除颤器的疗效和并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2022;18(3):e081221198647. doi: 10.2174/1573403X17666211208100151.

本文引用的文献

1
Device-related complications in subcutaneous versus transvenous ICD: a secondary analysis of the PRAETORIAN trial.皮下与经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器相关并发症:PRAETORIAN 试验的二次分析。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Dec 14;43(47):4872-4883. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac496.
2
A real-world experience of subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillators-comparison with the PRAETORIAN study.皮下和经静脉植入式心脏除颤器的真实世界经验——与PRAETORIAN研究的比较
J Arrhythm. 2022 Feb 21;38(2):199-212. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12687. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Subcutaneous ICD for more and transvenous ICD for few?!
皮下 ICD 更优还是经静脉 ICD 更佳?
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 May;111(5):475-478. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-01990-8. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
4
Comparative Assessment of Transvenous versus Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Therapy Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经静脉与皮下植入式心律转复除颤器治疗效果的比较评估:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Feb 15;349:62-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.11.029. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
5
Patient acceptance of subcutaneous versus transvenous defibrillator systems: A multi-center experience.患者对皮下与经静脉除颤器系统的接受度:一项多中心经验。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jan;33(1):81-89. doi: 10.1111/jce.15297. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Appropriate Shocks and Antitachycardia Pacing in Transvenous and Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillators: Analysis of All Appropriate Therapy in the PRAETORIAN Trial.经静脉和皮下植入式除颤器中适当电击和抗心动过速起搏的疗效和安全性:PRAETORIAN 试验中所有适当治疗的分析。
Circulation. 2022 Feb;145(5):321-329. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057816. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
7
EHRA expert consensus statement and practical guide on optimal implantation technique for conventional pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).EHRA 专家共识声明及关于传统起搏器和植入式心律转复除颤器最佳植入技术的实用指南:得到了心脏节律学会(HRS)、亚太心脏节律学会(APHRS)和拉丁美洲心脏节律学会(LAHRS)的认可。
Europace. 2021 Jul 18;23(7):983-1008. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa367.
8
Comparing the safety of subcutaneous versus transvenous ICDs: a meta-analysis.皮下植入式心律转复除颤器与经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器安全性的比较:一项荟萃分析
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Apr;60(3):355-363. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00929-1. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
9
1-Year Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Shocks: The Subcutaneous ICD Post Approval Study.1 年期临床转归和电击事件的前瞻性评估:皮下 ICD 获批后研究。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;6(12):1537-1550. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
10
Subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable defibrillator: An updated meta-analysis.皮下与经静脉植入式除颤器:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Mar;18(3):382-391. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.11.013. Epub 2020 Nov 16.